2013
09.29

Kevinpatrick Brady shared a link. 7 hours ago near Rochester, NY

Holy smokes and sakes alive.

I’ve been trying for nearly two [2] decades to enunciate to my fellow Americans and future generations, the ghastly circumstances under which I fell into a life altering abyss; a labyrinth of abusive, arbitrary government and no win litigation vortex which essentially raped me of every fundamental right of society I though I had. It then abandoned me.

Once I believed in the great American Experiment; the myth that we are all endowed with certain ‘inalienable’ rights that would be instantly recognized, respected and enforced by our honorable, ‘independent’ third branch of government. Today our third branch acts BOLDLY similar to the Third Reich.

PEOPLE! I am NOT just crying wolf. This aint your founding fathers America anymore. If you think ‘it cant happen here, or it won’t happen to me or my children’ I am sorry to report that you are whistling past the graveyard.

This documentary [July 2013] by fellow citizen Larken Rose enunciates contemporary America infinitely better than I’ve been able to do. If the last fifteen [15] minutes [‘Oath Keepers’ ] don’t scare the bejesus out of you then you are indeed one of the sheeple who believe ‘it cant happen here, or it won’t happen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx7XG-Ohx-A

2013
09.28

In an amazing demonstration, in the Motion To Dismiss filed by Randall Henzes on behalf of Attorney General Kathleen Kane of Pennsylvania, they utilize THE CHEWBACCA DEFENSE – “a technique so advanced nobody understands it.”

THE CHEWBACCA DEFENSE0330chewbacca

…ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor.

Now think about it; that does not make sense!

Why would a Wookiee, an 8-foot-tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of 2-foot-tall Ewoks? That does not make sense!

But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing.

Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense!

Look at me. I’m a lawyer defending the [Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania], and I’m talkin’ about Chewbacca! Does that make sense?

Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense!

None of this makes sense!

And so you have to remember, when you’re in that jury room deliberatin’ and conjugatin’ the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No!

Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense!

If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must [dismiss]! The defense rests.

To think this kind of farce is going on in courtrooms across the United States is demonstrative of why the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct was filed. The AGs cannot lawfully address the issues of judicial misconduct, and the resulting crime… so they stick their heads up their asses and act like those reporting it and suffering from it are crazy. Ever fearful of the ABSOLUTE DESTRUCTION which befalls anyone who addresses the crime. Those who violate Rule 1.6 and are disbarred and destroyed. It is a career, and life ending act.

That’s why it could only be lawfully filed by NON-lawyers…. and after they had been robbed of everything, including their constitutional rights while ignored by every level of law enforcement. Destroyed and terrorized until they HAD to find the resolution… their only escape.

Everything about the Motion To Dismiss is “horseshit”. It would be funny except that it is not.

Every citation is irrelevant. It does not make sense.

Every reference is irrelevant. It does not make sense.

Every footnote is incorrect. It does not make sense.

It is a clear representation of THE CHEWBACCA DEFENSE. They will continue on with such incredible inanity until exhaustion is the cause for dismissal.

They don’t give a fuck that people’s lives are being destroyed while they play their joke. The suggestion that I suffered through 8 years of terror and injustice just so I could play with them is twisted. Kathleen Kane, you, Tom Corbett and Linda Kelly never answered your phone when people called you to do your job. You have permitted the people to be terrorized for long enough. WE FOUND THE EXIT. LET US FREE.

AG Ignore

Kathleen Kane won’t even take calls emails or any form of contact to address or discuss the Federal filing. Remarkable, that she hasn’t reviewed her office phone records and see the hundreds of calls from me over the last 8 years.

The insult of having to respond to deliberate error and improper citation. This is really the best they could do? NO. IT IS ALL THEY CAN DO. THEY HAVE NO LAW TO TO USE AGAINST ME FOR POINTING OUT THEIR ACTIONS WHICH UNDERMINED THE CONSTITUTION. THEIR DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL LACK OF RELEVANCE IS FRIGHTENING.

The retaliatory actions against the Plaintiffs has never subsided. The damage to property, cars, homes, constant daily harassment by phone, after 8 years, Terance Healy would rather have committed suicide. But, he’s not capable so he lives to be terrorized another day. Emotionally, physically, mentally exhausted. The methods of terror being exposed weekly in the newspapers that he has experienced personally for the last 8 years while under the Rules which allow judicial terrorism.

Call off the private investigators who stalk and repeatedly tamper with my 80 year old mother’s car. The flat tires are not even annoying or funny. The lack of coordination is demonstrated by the failure to know which tire is affected. When tires were rotated, the problem didn’t rotate. MORE THAN ONCE! Devices attached to the house are available for retrieval. The water company can’t explain your devices. The chips are cancer inducing, yet the bio bonding glue is worse. It is very caustic and the topical affect is life threatening. The sonic noise interferes with my mother’s hearing aids. It is causing her ears to be constantly infected. But there’s no stopping the terror.

I suggest people start attaching the entire Rule 1.6 Challenge to their 1983 Abuse of Judicial Power Complaints. That is the script they are running to excuse judicial crimes. When you attach the Rule 1.6 challenge to your 1983 complaint, they can’t follow their usual script because they can’t address your loss of constitutionally protected rights… not without revealing the judicial crimes… and that would violate Rule 1.6 if they did so.

ASK YOURSELF…

1.) Why did no one from Pennsylvania prosecute Judge Ciavarella when he threw 5000 children in jail?

2.) Why was the one judge who spoke out against Judge Ciavarella removed from the Bench? Ask Judge Ann Lokuta.

3.) Why was Ann Lokuta not permitted to return to the bench after Judge Ciavarella went to prison?

The answer is simple, Rule 1.6 prevented it. Lawfully requiring the Attorney General of the state to ignore the crime and participate in concealing it from Federal Authorities.

4) Why do you think Jerry Sandusky was permitted to rape and molest children on the campus of Penn State University?

Find the act of judicial misconduct, and you will find the crime, the conspiracy and the state-wide cover-up… BECAUSE IT IS MANDATED BY LAW.

2013
09.25

Lawyers undermined our founding documents.

The country is clueless to the occurrence, but fully aware of the effect.

Yet, they do nothing. They point to problems, but never a solution. They can’t comprehend that it was made unlawful to end injustice – NO MATTER HOW BLATANT.

They made it lawful to ignore corruption. They made it mandatory to ignore injustice.

And when the cause was exposed the SILENCE became deafening.

The Solution is THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6 OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

The only guaranteed way to make a lawyer stop talking… deliver a copy.

The only guaranteed way to end further injustice in the courts… deliver a copy.

It’s not going to get better until it is stopped. It is not going to stop until it is exposed.

EXPOSE INJUSTICE. Serve up a copy of the Challenge. JUSTICE IS COMING.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/ChallengeRule1.6/

2013
09.24

blue_pill_red_pill1-478x346

a) See how deep the rabbit hole goes.

b) The story ends. You wake in your bed and you believe whatever you want to believe.

Rule 1.6 – the world pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.

Rule 1.6 prevents lawful action by law enforcement to prosecute crimes by judges. How many judges have ever been prosecuted by a state for judicial misconduct? How many states stopped judicial misconduct from continuing?

In Pennsylvania alone, the situation is clear. This isn’t attacking judicial immunity for errors in judgment. This is criminal actions and terror which is reported and goes unaddressed, unprosecuted, and unstopped.

Cash for Kids is the most blatant in memory. But it seems the concept that everyone looked the other way was acceptable.

WHY did they think their actions were lawful?

Because Rule 1.6 made it not only lawful, but MANDATORY.

Rule 1.6 is the world pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.

2013
09.23

What? Rule 1.6? That’s not…? That’s just…? Huh? Oh it’s about…
All of the reasons that you would NEVER look at Rule 1.6…
Reasons you should ignore Rule 1.6…
Move along… it doesn’t concern you. UNTIL IT DOES.

Rule 1.6 hides as a rule regarding Attorney-Client privilege.

Attorney-Client privilege builds trust based on the acceptance of concealing fraud and lies… even when the lies and fraud are presented in the court as truth.

Rule 1.6 is a smokescreen. A catch all which can be twisted as needed. The scripts are published. Everything about it is smoke and mirrors. Everything about it is wrong.

Rule 1.6 prevents lawful action by law enforcement to prosecute crimes by judges. How many judges have ever been prosecuted by a state for judicial misconduct? How many states stopped judicial misconduct from continuing? In Pennsylvania alone, the situation is clear. This isn;t attacking judicial immunity for errors in judgment. This is criminal actions and terror which is reported and goes unaddressed, unproscecuted, and unstopped. Cash for Kids is the most blatant in memory. But it seems the concept that everyone looked the other way was acceptable. WHY did they think their actions were lawful? Because Rule 1.6 made it not only lawful, but MANDATORY.

Attorney General Tom Corbett did nothing. Attorney General Linda Kelly did nothing. Attoenry General Kathleen Kane has been provided the opportunity to explain the failures of her predecessors. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 which has been served to AG Kane and the Attorneys General of the untied States provides the opportunity to end the lawful dismissal of criminal actions by the judiciary. BUT, it exposes the Rule which caused the inability to prosecute law. It exposes the organization behind the Rule adopted and enacted in every US state.

The American Bar Association.

Now, we have a much bigger problem. Treason? Sedition? RICO organization? With lawyers in every level of government who MUST follow their Rule 1.6 or face the consequences for breaking it. Violate Rule 1.6 and you are ruined, disbarred, and attacked. Any lawyer who dares to sp[eak out against a judge is not only ruined. They are destroyed. The penalties for violating Rule 1.6 are as extreme as if you were a victim of it’s destructive effect on justice.

The opportunity to lawfully address it was lawfully laid upon the Federal Bench in Philadelphia on August 8, 2013 by two pro se litigants who lawfuilly had standing, a lawful cause for relief, a court record to lawfully correlate their loss of rights and the sense to lawfully present the matter as a constitutional challenge lawfully permitting them to lawfully address the unconstitutional law in every state.

The Defendant AGs who could not lawfully respond to the Challenge… did the only lawful thing they could think of without mentioning any of the issues. They cannot address the issues lawfully, because any action which addresses the issues would be construed as violating Rule 1.6.

With the other AGs hiding in silence and WITHOUT ANY BASIS for the request, AG Kathleen Kane requested an extension in the deadline.

Judge O’Neill extended the deadline INDEFINITELY.

INDEFINITELY.

1175712_657480734270541_1168204953_n

2013
09.22

sharks

2013
09.22

1185668_10151661218949398_1434623809_n

2013
09.22

Kids for Cash happened because Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct prevented lawful action. With all of the injustice, there is one thing which it seems no one bothered to do. Point to the cause and present a solution. The Constitutional Challenge to Rule 1.6 is the solution which ends lawful injustice.

The story behind Rule 1.6 is more frightening… it was deliberate. it was intentional. It was executed by the American Bar Association.

When you consider the holocaust, people often indicate the world learned important lessons. It seems the American Bar Association learned how to do it better – pulling this off under the noses of 300 million Americans and enacting a law in every US State – – severe punishment to any lawyer who revealed it.


book
When thirteen-year-old Matthew appeared in front of Judge Mark Ciavarella for throwing a piece of steak at his mother’s boyfriend, he was sentenced to seven weeks at PA Child Care, a private, for-profit juvenile detention center in northeastern Pennsylvania. Angelia was fourteen when she and a friend scrawled “Vote for Michael Jackson” on five stop signs. Charged with vandalism and defacing public property, Angelia was sent by Ciavarella to PA Child Care without her epilepsy medication and suffered a grand mal seizure her second night. Fifteen-year-old Charlie, arrested for unknowingly purchasing a stolen motorbike, was convicted of a felony and sent to PA Child Care for six weeks.

Matthew, Angelia, and Charlie are just three children among the thousands who appeared in Ciavarella’s courtroom between 2003 and 2008 and were sent away—often with no attorney present and after only cursory hearings—to a detention facility in which, it later came to light, Ciavarella had a personal financial stake. As Kids for Cash reveals, this miscarriage of justice underscores a multitude of problems with our juvenile justice system, which too often criminalizes standard adolescent behavior, treats adolescents more harshly than if they were adults, and denies them their most fundamental constitutional rights.

William Ecenbarger, a Pulitzer Prize and George Polk Award–winning investigative journalist who covered the case for the Philadelphia Inquirer, now gives us the first book-length account of this shocking story. In the tradition of true-crime legal thrillers from The Executioner’s Song to A Civil Action, Ecenbarger exposes a deeply corrupt and broken system that ruined the lives of many children and ultimately led to the judge’s conviction on charges of racketeering, fraud, tax violations, money laundering, extortion, and bribery. Fastidiously researched and utterly propulsive, Kids for Cash takes us deep inside a profoundly flawed legal system, revealing the twisted and haunting realities of America’s juvenile justice system.

Review
“A harrowing tale, lucidly told by a journalist with a good eye for detail. . . . [Kids for Cash reveals] the deep gap between cherished ideals and harsh reality in a country addicted to incarceration.” —The New York Times Book Review

“The story is incredible: Thousands of children wrongfully sentenced to juvenile detention centers, many without legal representation and after cursory hearings, by two rogue judges in northern Pennsylvania who received millions of dollars in bribes from the private institutions’ owners. . . . William Ecenbarger, a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist, has brought this stunning story to book form in a deeply researched, compelling tale.” —The Boston Globe

“The worst stain (so far) on Pennsylvania, a state with more than its share of stains, is that of the Luzerne County judges who sent thousands of children to private prisons in exchange for millions of dollars in kickbacks. . . . Bill Ecenbarger offers a detail-packed, sickening account of the scandal and its impact. Anyone caring about courts, justice or children should read it.” —The Philadelphia Inquirer

“If only this were fiction. William Ecenbarger deserves our gratitude for shining the brightest of spotlights on a tragic, scandalous situation that brought pain and devastation to the lives of countless children and their families. Kids for Cash demands the attention of everyone who cares about justice.” —Bob Herbert, Distinguished Senior Fellow at Demos and former New York Times Op-Ed columnist

“A chilling account of how two Pennsylvania judges traded children’s freedom for personal profit while the rest of the Commonwealth looked the other way. Parents will tuck their children in a bit tighter after reading this true-crime heart-stopper.” —Nell Bernstein, award-winning journalist and author of All Alone in the World: Children of the Incarcerated

“William Ecenbarger exposes Pennsylvania’s recent juvenile justice disgrace wherein thousands of youth were illegally sentenced to a private detention facility in exchange for millions in kickbacks for the judges who sentenced them. His heartfelt, articulate outrage raises disturbing and critical questions about the destructive power of greed in our criminal justice system, and the legal and social systems that support it through silent acquiescence.”—Tara Herivel, attorney, author and co-editor of Prison Profiteers: Who Makes Money from Mass Incarceration and Prison Nation: The Warehousing of America’s Poor

“A gripping and inspirational ‘must read’ for anyone concerned about the health and well-being of children.” —Liz Ryan, President and CEO of Campaign for Youth Justice

“A gripping story of judicial incompetence, a system that ignored it, and the thousands of kids scarred for life—a story that begs for juvenile justice reform across America.” —Steven C. Teske, Chief Judge, Juvenile Court of Clayton County, GA, author of Reform Juvenile Justice Now

“An unimaginable story of abuse, greed, and corruption that also reveals the broader problems with our society’s failure to protect some of its most vulnerable, powerless, and at-risk members—a critically important book.” —Bryan Stevenson, founder and executive director of the Equal Justice Initiative, New York University Professor of Clinical Law

“This exposé of judicial indiscretion, greed, and money laundering reads like a thriller. The setting is the Luzerne County, PA, juvenile court system between 2003 and 2008, when two judges mishandled the criminal cases of thousands of children. After presenting a rather unflattering history of the region, citing a ‘culture of corruption,’ Pulitzer Prize—winning journalist [William] Ecenbarger describes the background and criminal activities that form the heart of the case. The book is based on 200 interviews and reflects the author’s insider knowledge of the scandal, which he covered for the Philadelphia Enquirer. . . . A solid, shocking work of investigative journalism, recommended for civic-minded general readers and students of juvenile justice issues.”
—Library Journal

2013
09.21

994605_635057743191388_310157353_n

1230044_10151729966724398_315794435_n

2013
09.21

Senator, the problem is that there was no lawful way to approach the crisis the country is facing.

Until 2 guys from suburban Philadelphia found the law which enabled the crisis and prevented resolution, and THEY COULD ADDRESS IT LAWFULLY. Once that law is declared by the court to be unconstitutional, a nullity, justice will be resurrected.

Pay attention to how many times you have been told about lack of jurisdiction. Rule 1.6 prevented lawful action.

“We have agencies that are rife with fraud and programs that are rife with fraud, and Congress has not done anything about it, they have agreed not to do anything about it. I think we’re working too well together.” Sen. Tom Coburn

We need a constitutional convention to take back our country

Senator Tom Coburn does not know that there can be no convention, because the lawyers can’t repair the damage they have done. Not until we get this Rule out of the way. Anyone in the government who mentions the issues which subvert the Constitution is likely NOT a lawyer. The lawyers know that is CONFIDENTIAL, and the punishment for talking is brutal.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/sen.-tom-coburn-we-need-a-constitutional-convention-to-take-back-our-country/article/2534671

1235133_10151893037259855_1759250633_n

%d bloggers like this: