A Terroristic Divorce

One question
– to expose and resolve the quagmire of problems encountered by lawyers mandated by non-disclosure and excused for fraud and lies.
– to prevent the overthrow of the first non-lawyer in the Executive Branch since Ronald Reagan.

AS A GOVERNMENT LAWYER WHO’S CLIENTS INCLUDE THE GOVT, THE DEPARTMENT, THE AGENCY, THE STAFF AND PRIOR OFFICE HOLDERS, IS THERE INFORMATION WHICH YOU WERE PREVENTED FROM DISCLOSING IN YOUR REPORT AND INFORMATION WHICH YOU WILL NOT INCLUDE IN TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO THE NONDISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION?

Follow Up: Are you aware that Rule 1.6, enacted by the Judiciary, is unconstitutional and has been improperly enacted in every state and federally while capable of ignoring every law and ignoring constitutionally protected rights while capable of evading any appeal or review.

Adversely affecting the integrity of the judiciary, who improperly enacted the confidentiality rule, any review demonstrating UNCONSTITUTIONALITY would also be held confidential by this unconstitutional law. How do you escape an unconstitutional law that has a self defense mechanism; which has further been concealed for 30+ years by additional judicial rules to avoid disclosure of a bad law which has undermined the judiciary, undermined the practice of law, undermined justice; and undermines the US Constitution?