A Terroristic Divorce

I HAVE REVIEWED THE PAPERWORK WHICH WAS RELEASED.

PA Supreme Court Order Suspending Kathleen Kane’s Law License (pdf)

THERE ARE SEVERAL INDICATORS WHICH SUGGEST THAT RULE 1.6 MAY BE SILENTLY CONCEALING A FRAUD.  Lapses in logic. I am not a lawyer, SO I may point them out.

KATHLEEN KANE IS HAVING HER LAW LICENSE SUSPENDED YET SHE GETS TO KEEP HER JOB ACCORDING TO THE ‘ORDER’.

THERE IS NO JUDGE’S SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.  

THERE ARE NO SIGNATURES ON THE ORDER AT ALL.
– No list of any affirming or dissenting Justices by name.

One might consider that the PER CURIAM order could be a farce drafted by lawyers whose improper actions are concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

Per Curiam Orders are most often issued without judicial review.  They are for housekeeping issues, scheduling issues, and standardized responses which are intended to address simple issues before the matter is presented to the judiciary for review.

A reasonable person might expect the suspension of the law license of the State Attorney General would merit judicial review and signatures.

A reasonable person might consider that where this Per Curiam Order further modifies THE COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY ACT which was passed by an elected Legislature and signed by an elected Governor, the Judicial branch is overreaching and usurping the authority of the Legislative and Executive branches.

A reasonable person might notice that THERE IS NO REAL DIRECT EVIDENCE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OR INVOLVEMENT.Perhaps it is NOT the judiciary that is overreaching their authority.

Have the lawyers working within the Judicial system exposed their ability to usurp the Judicial branch while silencing the Executive and Legislative? Rule 1.6 would mandate nondisclosure by lawyers, and permit fraud in the furtherance to conceal their corruption.

Claims in the media report it was a unanimous Supreme Court of Pennsylvania who issued the order. The documents provided do not support that suggestion.

The documents clearly indicate that a group of lawyers on the Disciplinary Board ignored the facts and based their request for suspension on implications, inferences and broad speculation while aware that there has been no judicial review of the case (a hearing) or any conviction.

Rule 1.6 would conceal the fraud. Rule 1.6 would prevent lawyers from inquiring or exposing the fraud. Intimidation would also apply to any lawyers who would be exposing the corruption within the very system which disciplines and controls those in the legal profession… and their disciplinary meetings are handled CONFIDENTIALLY.

THAT IS ONLY PAGE ONE! THERE WERE OVER 250 PAGES PROVIDED.

Oddly, there have been no statements issued from Justices on the PA Supreme Court regarding “their” decision.

Where the Per Curiam Order has all of the attributes of a forgery, a fraud and a farce… Yet, pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality, Lawyers cannot point that out.  Kathleen Kane could expose it, BUT ONLY WHEN SHE IS PRESENTING HER DEFENSE TO THE COURT. 

I suspect that if the Senate removes Kathleen Kane from her elected office before her trial, the Montgomery County District Attorney might suggest that Kane has paid the price for her alleged crimes and drop the charges.  THUS, PREVENTING KATHLEEN KANE FROM ANY DEFENSE, ANY DISCLOSURE, ANY RECOURSE.

As an attorney, Kathleen Kane must maintain Rule 1.6 confidentiality unless defending herself… even where the nondisclosure relates to the unconstitutional Confidentiality law. You may recall that there were two secret orders from unidentified courts which CONFIDENTIALLY ordered Kathleen Kane, the individual, to neglect the responsibilities of her elected office. Those responsibilities include actions in cases where constitutional issues arise.

In Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller, the Superior Court has not provided documents in the matter, AND KATHLEEN KANE HAD NEGLECTED HER RESPONSIBILTIES AS ATTORNEY GENERAL WITHOUT EXPLANATION.

It was stated early on by the Attorney General that the corruption was larger than anticipated, that it went deeper, and it was fighting back.

NOT ABOVE DIRTY TRICKS: Former Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor’s New Year’s Manifesto. Commissioner Bruce Castor “schooled in how to really hurt you” and “to [screw] others”

Once affected by unconstitutional Rule 1.6, the victim has no protection of the law; all constitutionally protected rights are ignored and denied; and there is no opportunity for recourse or restoration of rights or protection of law.  Ever.

Seriously.  No escape ever. 

The judiciary have lost independence. They are held hostage to their own improperly enacted Confidentiality law. Rule 1.6.  The author controls the entire US state and federal judiciary held hostage.

Where the mandate of nondisclosure became law, corruption within law enforcement became concealed by broad Confidentiality and by the more narrow Attorney Client Privilege.

As Attorney General, Kathleen Kane’s clients include the Governor who once ran the perverted OAG, the staff of the OAG who have falsely accused her, and the District Attorneys who are prosecuting her.  The lawyers know they may falsely accuse while Kane is not permitted to disclose the truth to defend herself… Until that opportunity arrives, she must protect the clients.

You may have noticed the carefully choreographed dance around releasing the porn emails.  As the Attorney for the pervey emailers, Kane could not ask for the release of the emails directly.  And while she couldn’t prosecute her accusers, she could fire them to prevent their further sabotage of cases and investigations.  So, she did. 

By the improperly enacted collaterally unconstitutional Rule 1.6 mandate, Kane may not break her silence unless she is defending herself before the Court.

This is why the trial is taking place in the media with misinformation.  Kane indicated early on that THE CORRUPTION WAS HUGE… AND IT WAS FIGHTING BACK.

Confidentiality may also be breached in the case of a threat of a person’s death. In this instance, the Governor is already looking into why the prisoners on death row are living out their lives there. With no threat of death, the injustice which placed them on death row may be held confidential.

The judges have not become so politicized to be politicians. Many statements about political judges and campaign funding are designed to distract.

The author of Rule 1.6, and the Rules of Professional Conduct is the American Bar Association with affiliated associations in every major jurisdiction of state and federal court. When the lawyers in the clerks offices may intercept and interfere, it is concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality. They further avoid prosecution because of the mandate of silence. 

“Out of bad habit these blind fools spend their lives passing judgments contrary to what is right.”

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality has a built-in self defense which requires nondisclosure of the affect of Rule 1.6.  Ask any lawyer.  They have been trained NOT TO SEE IT. When they do, they will become silent. Rule 1.6 silent.

Where misdeeds of the clerks/lawyers undermine the rights of litigants which are presumed protected by the US Constitution, Rule 1.6 has a clear collateral unconstitutional affect on substantive rights. So, the Supreme Court lacked authority to enact the Rule into Law. (PA Const Article V Section 10 c provides conditional authority.)

BUT, as the courts are the self-appointed sole arbiters of what is Constitutional, you first must get past the lawyers in the clerks offices before any judge may review the issues to even consider issuing any mea culpa for the u constitutional law and the violation of the Public Trust.

The Legislature may suspend the law, BUT their leadership will not allow the issue to be presented.

As such, ONLY Governor Tom Wolf can call the Legislature to assemble to address the improperly enacted unconstitutional Confidentiality law.

To get to the Governor, you have to get through the Office Of General Counsel.  Where GC Jessica Diaz is aware of the unconstitutional aspects and affect, her efforts which have prevented any meeting with the Governor are a direct denial of constitutional rights… An act of TREASON for the purpose of continuing the ABA usurpation of judicial authority and undermining the rights of every American.

Rule 1.6 was improperly enacted in every state gradually from 1984 through 2009 at the urging of the American Bar Association – who had deliberately removed the fraud provisions from Rule 1.6.  The ABA knew exactly what they were doing.  Their members have profited from injustice.

I HAVE REVIEWED THE PAPERWORK WHICH WAS RELEASED.

PA Supreme Court Order Suspending Kathleen Kane’s Law License (pdf)

THERE ARE A FEW INDICATORS WHICH SUGGEST THAT RULE 1.6 MAY BE SILENTLY CONCEALING A FRAUD.. I am not a lawyer, SO I may point them out..

KATHLEEN KANE IS HAVING HER LAW LICENSE SUSPENDED YET GETTING TO KEEP HER JOB ACCORDING TO THE ‘ORDER’.

THERE IS NO JUDGE’S SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER. 
THERE ARE NO SIGNATURES ON THE ORDER AT ALL.
– No list of any affirming or dissenting Justices by name.

One might consider that the PER CURIAM order could be a farce drafted by lawyers whose improper actions are concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

Per Curiam Orders are most often issued without judicial review.  They are for housekeeping issues, scheduling issues, and standardized responses which are intended to address simple issues before the matter is presented to the judiciary for review.

One might expect the suspension of the law license of the State Attorney General would merit judicial review and signatures.

One might consider that where this Per Curiam Order further modifies THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ACT which was passed by an elected Legislature and signed by an elected Governor, the Judicial branch is overreaching and usurping the authority of the Legislative and Executive branches.

AND THAT IS ONLY PAGE ONE! THERE WERE OVER 250 PAGES PROVIDED.

Where the Per Curiam Order has all of the attributes of a forgery, a fraud and a farce… but pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality, Lawyers cannot point that out.  Kane could expose it, ONLY ONCE SHE IS PRESENTING HER DEFENSE IN COURT. 

I suspect that if the Senate would remove Kathleen Kane from her elected office before her trial, the Montgomery County District Attorney might suggest that Kane has paid the price for her alleged crime and drop the charges.  THUS, PREVENTING KATHLEEN KANE FROM ANY DEFENSE, ANY DISCLOSURE, ANY RECOURSE.

Once affected by unconstitutional Rule 1.6, the victim has no protection of the law; all constitutionally protected rights are ignored and denied; and there is no opportunity for recourse or restoration of rights or protection of law.  Ever.

Seriously.  No escape ever. 

Injustice within the courts which triggers confidentiality pursuant to Rule 1.6 can affect ANY litigant.  Even Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane.  The result is the loss of any protection of the law and where all constitutional rights are denied and ignored.

There is no recourse and no method to restore the litigant.  This is a deliberate collateral affect of Rule 1.6 silence.

As such, where Rule 1.6 affects the substantive rights of a litigant the Supreme Court of PA did NOT have authority to enact the law pursuant to Article V section 10 c.

Facts are disregarded.  Laws are simply ignored, improperly applied, or left unsubstantiated within the volumes of  misinformation in the court filings.

I have experienced the loss of protection of the law and my constitutitonal rights have been ignored since 2007.  There is no recovery.  The victims end up 1) Homeles/Destitute 2) Incarcerated or 3) Suicide.

Any and every criminal action against the litigant will be excused or ignored by law enforcement and the courts.  Every level of state and federal  law enforcement.  Every level of state and federal courts.

Taking Kane’s license is an action which is designed to prevent her from ever offering a defense. 

Should Kane be removed from office, the charges will be dropped and any  opportunity to present and demonstrate the affects of improperly enacted and unconstitutional  Rule 1.6 Confidentiality will be lost.

Other cases can demonstrate the matter, but cannot break the media blackout of the problem. The reason people seem to think the US Constitution is dead… is because it is being IGNORED pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.

There are only two situations where Rule 1.6 Confidentiality is not mandated.  1) to prevent murder and 2) where a lawyer is defending themselves.

The hearings in May abruptly ended where the opportunity for Kane to present a defense had arrived.  Passing that issue to the District Attorney was a further delaying tactic.

…

In my case, EVEN WHERE THE CONSPIRACY TO PROVISION PLAN AND TRAIN FOR MY MURDER HAS BECOME CLEAR,  Lawyers in the Office of the Attorney General and/or the Montgomery County District Attorneys Office have remained silent.   Where the lawyers know the documented threat is a farce, it can be an effective intimidation tactic.

The problem remains where Attorney Client Privilege has the top law enforcement officers in the state and in the county doing NOTHING while the victim is denied any life, any joy, any future, and actions continue to intrude and prevent being secure.

The retailiation for surviving 9 years of injustice, while my life, family, friednships and career was annihilated is the continued abuse by false allegations.

MY ADVICE TO KATHLEEN KANE IS TO BREAK THE SILENCE BEFORE ITS TOO LATE.  BREAKING THE SILENCE WILL SHOW THE ACTIONS AGAINST HER ARE UNLAWFUL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL.  KANE KNOWS THIS TO BE TRUE… secret orders from unidentified courts confirm it.

If she breaks that secret, the American Justice System can be restored. The Constitution rebooted.  And people may again believe in liberty AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

The paperwork released recently provides the opportunity to review and compare manipulations pursuant to Rule 1.6.  This will be detailed in a future post in the coming days.

PA Supreme Court Order Suspending Kathleen Kane’s Law License (pdf)

I have lived through, survived, and continue to be victimized without any protection of the law and have had all constitutional rights ignored and denied since 2007. The ‘games’ they are playing are well documented on this web site. The media misinformation is such a deliberate massive distortion. It is clear that they are avoiding any mention of Attorney-Client Privilege, while it is at the center of everything.

Every public official has an Oath.  Getting the official signed copy is no big deal.  Using a search warrant is OVERKILL.  

Why create the drama of using a search warrant and ‘raiding’ the Offices of the Attorney General. 

Sources: Thursday search of AG Kane’s office was targeted to grand jury secrecy oath

New Search Warrant Executed at AG Kanes office

Kane’s office searched by Montgomery County detectives

Seeking out the OFFICIAL copy of an OATH is a game which “internet lawyers” have been suggesting people seek out to suggest that judges and officials are not following their oaths. 

It’s an annoyance… A misdirection which lawyers mock because every oath is undermined by the Rules of Professional Conduct.

One law usurps and ignores all rules, procedures, laws, statutes and constitutions…. It’s confidential though.

There is actually a law which requires all lawyers and judges to maintain confidentiality and Non-disclosure even where the law is not followed and constitutionally protected rights are being Ignored and denied.  Rule 1.6 affects the substantive rights of litigants in this way.  As such, the Article V Section 10 c authority for the judiciary to enact the law is INVALID, IMPROPER, AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality prevents the court from revealing they have been undone and their authority usurped by the author of the unconstitutional law.  The American Bar Association.

The idea that public officials are not following their oaths is EVIDENT… Not one official does anything to preserve protect or defend the Constitution of the United States.  In the case of lawyers, they are mandated by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality (which includes Attorney Client Privilege).

Court clerks don’t go to jail for violating peoples rights for marriage licenses.  No prosecution, either.  They go to jail for contempt of court for not following an order of the court.  Why is there no prosecution for their violation of the Constitutional rights of Americans?  Confidentiality prevents prosecution.

Where the government is the largest entity able to violate Constitutional rights, the obligation of Confidentiality and Non-disclosure of their clients wrongdoing results in the Attorneys General and District Attorneys having no ability to prosecute violations of law and constitutional rights within government agencies and departments

Rule 1.6 undermines law enforcement and usurps the authority of the judiciary.  The victims have no recourse.

Clearly, an Attorney Client privilege relationship DOES NOT EXIST between Montgomery County District Attorney Risa Ferman and Attorney General Kathleen Kane.

Where there may be a privileged relationship between Attorney General and District Attorney, Kathleen Kane is prevented from disclosure unless and until she is defending herself in court. This explains the trial by media misinformation.

You have to wonder why the District Attorney prosecuting Attorney General Kathleen Kane is seeking to attack the media statements which the Attorney General has offered.

One might think that there is nothing solid to connect Kane to the leak.

Those OAG employees involved who had supposedly testified against Kane to the Grand jury have been embarassed by emails which demonstrate VERY UNPROFESSIONAL on the job activity.  Many have been fired or left the OAG.  By law, Kane cannot expose crimes committed by persons in the OAG.  Attorney-client privilege applies even when their crime is falsely accusing the Attorney General.

The document which is at the center of the leak IS NOT ACTUALLY THE LEAKED DOCUMENT.  ITS A COPY.

Though the prosecutor described the document and its cover in ridiculously needless and exhaustingly repetitive detail… IT TURNS OUT that the clear plastic cover and heavy cardboard backing were not available. Thrown away.  Along with any possible forensic evidence (fingerprints, printer identifier, etc…) which could identify those who handled the document.  Whether it be Kane herself, or those who are attempting to set her up.

The prosecutor spent such an exhausting amount of time describing the report and cover.  And who would have handled it, placed it, skimmed it, reviewed it, seen it, discussed it,… Over and over, clear plastic cover, blue backing.

FINALLY, When Kane’s attorney inquired about forensic testing of the cover and document ONLY to find out the originalS are not available and the cover was trashed, a packed courtroom collectively exhaled… ARE YOU F’ing KIDDING ME?

The prosecution wasted hours describing it and it isn’t available.  When the actions of the prosecutor are NOT about getting to the truth,  the effort to exhaust people with misleading information is reprehensible…

People are figuring out that the case against Attorney General Kathleen Kane is a farce.  They await the other shoe… Why are they really going after Kathleen Kane?

Attorney General Kathleen Kane is aware of the UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF RULE 1.6 and its affect on litigants, law enforcement, and the judiciary.  Problem is that when demonstrated to be unconstitutional, SECRET ORDERS FROM UNIDENTIFIED COURTS ordered the person, Kathleen Kane, to neglect the responsibilities of the Office of Attorney General to which she had been popularly elected… AND ORDERED NONDISCLOSURE OF THE CONTENTS OF THOSE ORDERS.

UNCONSTITUTIONAL RULE 1.6 was ‘secretly’ recaste into a direct order to continue unconstitutional confidentiality. Continuing the denial of the protection of the law and denial of constitutionally protected rights of an individual left without recourse and suffering further injustice. Rule 1.6 is the cause of AMERICAN INJUSTICE IGNORED.

The Attorney General cannot prosecute employees (clients) who deliberately bungle cases, BUT she can fire them.  So she did.

Attorney Client Privilege would even conceal if a criminal porn syndicate involved OAG employees.  BUT, Kane could fire them! So she did.

They could retaliate knowing (as lawyers do know) that Kane, as Attorney General with multiple Attorney Client relationships throughout the govt, would be mandated by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information to maintain secrecy.

Rule 1.6 has unconstitutional affects which ignore the rights of litigants while concealing the corruption of government employees WHO CANNOT BE PROSECUTED.

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OR DISTRICT ATTORNEY HAS AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP PROTECTING CORRUPT STATE AND COUNTY EMPLOYEES FROM PROSECUTION.

But Kane could fire them… So she did.

The same cannot be said for Montgomery County DA Risa Ferman who continues to use her position to deny protection of the law, ignore Constitutional rights, and protect the corrupt individuals, departments and agencies which she represents.

When Ferman became DA she vowed to prosecute corruption .  Embarassingly, Ferman set up a group to investigate corruption. Then, she found out that she protects the corrupt county personnel as their attorney. Her corruption investigators disappeared without a single case.

One difference… The corrupt personnel within Montgomery County continue their corruption and injustice against people who have no recourse for the injustice they receive.  The corruption grows unchecked. 

Ferman could fire them… BUT SHE DOESN’T.

Risa Ferman is none too happy that the Pennsylvania Attorney General has access and ownership of ALL INVESTIGATIVE DATA in the state… The Attorney General has all the collected investigative information and evidence of corruption concealed by an unconstitutional silence.  Even the Montgomery County  corruption improperly concealed by ‘investigative grand juries’.

Those secret orders from unidentified courts… were issued in regard to one case in Montgomery County.  The corruption was so deliberate.  The conspiracy to deny justice was so determined, so undeniable and absolute.  The participation of each county office and agency was coordinated by District Attorney Risa Ferman who also prevented any investigation by county, state and federal authorities.

The events of the case are well documented… on the court record… and on the web… A TERRORISTIC DIVORCE. 

Nine years and counting.  Over 20 Montgomery County judges.  Exposing the undermining efforts of corruption in every state and federal court and jurisdiction.  Concealed by lawyers mandated to follow an unconstitutional Confidentiality.

I don’t hate lawyers.  I do hate the unconstitutional law which has annihilated my life, family, and friends. 

I am not a lawyer.  I do not have to keep their secret.  I’ve been called “the worst kept secret in Pennsylvania”. 

Unconstitutional Rule 1.6 is exposed.  Justice Is Coming. 

Life without protection of the law and constitutional rights is only surviving… where I have no other choice but to persevere while the corruption fights back.

#3151-15
#MJ-38118-CR-0000096-2015

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
Terance Healy

STATEMENT OF DEFENDANT ON SEPTEMBER 16, 2015

The criminal allegations are unfounded.

I have not previously and do not intend to waive any rights under Pennsylvania Law, the Pennsylvania Constitution or the Constitution of the United States.

I have not signed any Waiver of Counsel. There has been no colloquy. The inability to be represented by counsel is affected by an improperly enacted and collaterally unconstitutional Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.

Rule 1.6 causes a complete and absolute denial of any protection of the law and all constitutionally protected rights are ignored.

My appearance at this, or any, proceeding should not be misconstrued in any way to suggest or indicate any waiver of any protection of the law or the constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania which provide for the jurisdiction of the courts.

ATTEMPTS TO RESOLVE ISSUES DIRECTLY WERE UNANSWERED

The attorney for the Commonwealth and the Montgomery County District Attorney have been contacted to address those issues which affect the proceeding on this date. THERE HAS BEEN NO RESPONSE.

I appear at this time in the interest of resolving necessary issues which will permit me to prepare to represent and defend myself.

This document incorporates and includes the following documents filed in this matter in their entirety:
– Statement of Defendant on April 9, 2015
– Letter to District Attorney Risa Ferman
– Notice to Appear for Arraignment
– Statement of Defendant on June 10, 2015
– Letter to Attorney General Kathleen Kane on June 11, 2015
– Waiver of Arraignment – coerced under duress on June 10, 2015
– Challenge to Jurisdiction dated June 19, 2015
– Letter dismissing a Private Criminal Complaint dated June 23, 2015
– Statement of Defendant on August 10, 2015.

DELIBERATE ACTIONS WHICH UNDERMINE/PREVENT APPEAL

The documents in this matter neglect to indicate the elements necessary for the jurisdiction of this court.

The failure of the attorney for the Commonwealth to follow the laws and procedures of the Commonwealth cause a lack of jurisdiction for this court to review or decide on this matter.

The documents in this matter have not been docketed in a timely manner.

The documents in this matter have not been provided to the Defendant.

The documents in this matter have not been signed by the judge.

These deliberate failures prevent timely appeal and additionally prevent any review where jurisdiction is lacking to review the matter on Appeal.

FAILURE TO NOTIFY

The notification of the proceeding today was listed, however the Defendant received no notice from the court.

DELIBERATE NEGLECT AND FAILURE BY THE ATTORNEY FOR THE COMMONWEALTH

The attorney for the commonwealth is a client of the District Attorney.

The attorney-client privilege aspect of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information prevents any actions to address the deliberate failures to follow the Law, the Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the US Constitution where the attorney deliberates neglecting her responsibilities is represented by the District Attorney.

DELIBERATE NEGLECT AND FAILURE BY THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

A Public Defender has indicated that he has been assigned to the case and has begun filing documents.

He has not contacted the Defendant, nor has he returned calls, nor has he provided copies of the documents purportedly filed on the behalf of the Defendant.

The Public Defender is a client of the District Attorney.

The attorney-client privilege aspect of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information prevents any actions to address the deliberate failures to follow the Law, the Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the US Constitution where the attorney deliberates neglecting his responsibilities is represented by the District Attorney.

THE HEARING TO DETERMINE ANY NECESSITY FOR REPRESENTATION IS SET TO SEPTEMBER 18, 2015. YET, A PUBLIC DEFENDER HAS ALREADY FILED IN THIS MATTER.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION DOCUMENTS

The Documents provided within the INFORMATION are incomplete. The District Attorney’s Office has neglected to address the reported issues, or to return calls and messages.

NON-WAIVER OF COUNSEL

I do NOT waive the right to be represented by an attorney/lawyer/counselor.

I am destitute and cannot afford an attorney.

Every attorney within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is mandated by the Rules of Professional Conduct UNLESS and UNTIL they recognize the unconstitutionality of the law enacted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

A waiver of counsel with the knowledge of potential “dangers and disadvantages of self-representation” cannot be executed where comprehension, acknowledgement and experience demonstrate the affect of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information which causes the facts to be ignored.

Defendant recognizes that this Court will likely proceed without regard for the procedures and laws established in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and THAT DELIBERATE AND BLATANT DISREGARD will be ignored at every level of the Court pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.

The Defendant recognizes that the judiciary have improperly enacted Rule 1.6 into law without authority.

The Defendant recognizes that the judiciary have mandated CONFIDENTIALITY with regard to the improperly enacted and collaterally unconstitutional Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.

The Defendant has communicated the issue to the Pennsylvania Legislature as the Legislature has the sole authority to suspend a law pursuant to the Constitution Of Pennsylvania.

The Defendant has communicated the issue to Governor Thomas Wolf as the governor has the authority to call the Legislature to Harrisburg to address the issue.

The Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Kathleen Kane, has been kept informed of the matter as her responsibilities include review of the constitutionality of laws within the commonwealth.

Kathleen Kane has indicated in the media that ‘secret orders from unidentified courts’ mandate that she personally neglect the responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General to which she was elected.

– Those orders correspond to actions in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania where the responsibilities to address the constitutionality of a state law pursuant to Rule 521 has resulted in the unavailability of orders and documents in several cases. The Superior Court has not substantiated their actions in law.

THE DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE LAWS AND THE RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND THE NEGLECT BY THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND THE ATTORNEY FOR THE COMMONWEALTH CAUSE A DENIAL OF THE PROTECTION OF THE LAW FOR THE DEFENDANT AND IGNORE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE DEFENDANT… while concealed and remaining unaddressed pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The actions of the Court in this matter are UNEXPLAINED and/or UNSUBSTANTIATED where issues which have not been addressed by the District Attorney deny the court of proper subject matter jurisdiction in this matter due to deliberate procedural errors, the failure to follow procedures and laws, and the failure to address the rights of the defendant protected by the constitution of the United States.

The following topics require more research and effort on the part of the Defendant who has not been provided time to research and prepare while attempting to address the issues involved in the matter before this Court.

In the interest of keeping the Court advised and informed of issues and questions which are raised regarding the matter, the Defendant respectfully provides the following listing:

1. The Defendant requests to be formally informed of the Charges against him.

2. The ‘Arraignment’ paperwork indicates “SEE TRANSCRIPT” yet, the Defendant has not been provided the transcripts for the matter.

3. The revised copies of the complaint have not been signed by the District Attorney as required by law.

4. Their appears to be a conflict of interest with the Montgomery County Judiciary. A majority of the judges having been directly involved in matters which relate to this case since 2007.

5. Their appears to be a conflict of interest where the matters directly relate to ‘secret orders from unidentified courts’ which prevent Kathleen Kane from her elected responsibilities as Attornry General of Pennsylvania.

6. There appears to be a direct conflict of interest where the Montgomery County District Attorney has neglected to address, investigate, prosecute or respond to criminal complaints which relate to the matter and which demonstrate the ‘confidential’ neglect caused by Rule 1.6.

7. The Defendant requests the Court excuse the costs of subpoenas which must be served in this matter to properly prepare a defense. Subpoenas must be served upon the entire Pennsylvania Legislature, several courts which have neglected to provide documents, the Office of the Attorney General, county and local law enforcement agencies, and others.

8. The Defendant has not received complete documentation in the INFORMATION recently received from the District Attorneys office which has been contacted and refused to address the missing documents and pages.

9. An apparent forgery of the signature of Risa Vetri Ferman appears on the incomplete INFORMATION when compared to the signature which appears on the Complaint served upon Kathleen Kane in recent days.

10. Where the incomplete information prevents the Defendant from preparing an effective and complete defense to the, as yet, informal charges identified, Defendant requests the Court address the failure to of the District Attorneys office to follow procedures and laws and provide a deadline for the production of items which have been available for the preparation of the case against him.

DEATH THREAT

Within the INFORMATION paperwork provided was a five page document from a witness in the matter which demonstrates an effort to provision, plan and train to kill the Defendant based on irrational, paranoid and delusional events.

The District Attorney’s Office have had this document since March and failed to advise the Defendant of this credible threat to his life.

The witness is living in the Defendant’s Home and has not produced any documents which contradict the documented, reported and neglected fraudulent conveyance of the property, or demonstrate a ‘purported’ lawful ownership of the property.

The Office of the District Attorney has refused to address the issue.

The Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas has improperly denied jurisdiction with prejudice.

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania documents are incomplete, unsubstantiated, and unsigned. The paperwork supports the decision of the lower court.

Where access to the courts is being improperly prevented by an incorrect lack of jurisdiction, the matter was raised in February to the Governor and the Legislature to address this lack of jurisdiction. It is my understanding that my document is the basis for the criminal charges.

Yet, a letter which clearly plans, provisions and trains for the Defendant’s execution based on detailed deluded and paranoid ideations has been ignored.

The true threat in this matter is being ignored. Rule 1.6 has that influence on the integrity of the judiciary and the legal profession while under a confidential mandate to undermine and deny the constitutional rights of litigants.

Respectfully Submitted,
Terance Healy

Tomorrow is the CALL OF THE TRIAL.  I have not been notified.   Tactical non-notification.

I can’t imagine what to expect … Not one event has gone as indicated by law.

There has been no Arraignment.

There was no Conference.  Just the judge saying it would go to Trial.

There has been no response to the LACK OF JURISDICTION.

There has been no response to anything from the DA.

They have apparently prematurely assigned a defender who is getting the notices instead and filing motions without contacting me at all.  The railroad to prison overpopulation.

All I can imagine is that his secretly filed documents are undermining my rights.

Then the pre-hearing to decide my Competency – if I should be forced to have lawyer from the public defender office – is on Friday. Yet an attorney is already filing on the case from the public defenders office.  AND NOT RETURNING CALLS.

AND THEY ARE CALLING ME INCOMPETENT?

Rule 1.6 protects the violations of law and rights where the DA represents the Attorney for the Commonwealth and must hold their corrupt actions confidential.

Rule 1.6 protects the deliberate and intentional failures of the Public Defenderhe where the DA represents the Public Defenderhe and his office and must hold their corrupt actions confidential.

All the while I am further threatened and terrorized.

I’ve begged for your help.  The silence is unsettling.

I was pleased that AG Kane indicated her awareness of me case.  I would appreciate attendance or representation of the PA Executive Branch.  Nine years of this is ALOT for one man to take.

The Attorney-Client privilege part of improperly enacted and unconstitutional Rule 1.6 protects Pennsylvania Pervs and Predators where sabotaged investigations indicate that the syndicate was being run from within law enforcement.

ACP prevented the Attorney General from exposing the wrongdoing of the employees of the Office of the Attorney General.
.. as it does in the county District Attorneys offices as well.

Unconstitutional Rule 1.6 affected the substantive rights of litigants and as such the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had no authority to enact this repugnant abomination to the Constitution of the United States.

While Sandusky exposes these actions, the undermining affect of Rule 1.6 can be used against ANY AND EVERY litigant to deny protection of the law and constitutional rights.

Where Montgomery County District Attorney Risa Vetri Ferman has demonstrated the deliberate and intentional negligence in Commonwealth v Healy… Attorney Lauren McNulty’s lawlessness, and complete denial of all constitutional rights of the Defendant are prevented from prosecution where the Prosecutor must protect her client, the corrupt people within her administration and county offices.

Ferman’s actions include the immediate appointment of a Public Defender for the purpose of concealing the Denial of Healy’s Constitutional rights and ignoring any and every law which was not followed.  The Public Defender is also protected from prosecution by Attorney Client privilege aspect of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information .

The Defendant, Healy, is being railroaded into a punishment for a crime which he did not commit… WHILE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE HAS CONSPIRED TO DENY RIGHTS, DENY LAW, AND PARTICIPATED IN EFFORTS TO THREATEN, INTIMIDATE AND MURDER HIM.

These actions which are neglected within a court of law undermine the rights of litigants, and DEFENDANTS in criminal cases, AND OBLITERATE ANY JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE – a necessary element for jurisdiction of the courts.

http://www.infowars.com/video-sandusky-pedophile-cronies-go-after-popular-pa-attorney-general/Sandusky Cronies Go After Popular Attorney General

It’s their game…

I have an unsigned undocketed forged order issued without jurisdiction.

To appeal you must provide a copy of the docket.  CAN’T.

To appeal you must provide a copy of the order.  CAN’T.

For an Appeal to be accepted, the court must have jurisdiction to hear the appeal.  CAN’T.
(So lawyers in appellate court intercept, Intervene, obstruct and forge. Concealed by Rule 1.6)

To decide, the appellate court must have jurisdiction.  CAN’T.
(So lawyers intercept, Intervene, obstruct and forge.  Concealed by Rule 1.6)

The ABA has affiliated bar associations in every major state and federal jurisdiction.  It’s what they do to conceal their overthrow of the Judicial system in every state and FEDERALLY.

They refer to these ‘orders’ as unappealable.  I call it void and defective fraud upon the court which violates the public trust.  Tomato – potato.

Unable to file a regular NOTICE OF APPEAL, I reported my NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania via Twitter. 
CAN’T?   DID!

Served the Report of the NOTICE OF APPEAL upon the Montgomery County District Attorney via Twitter.
CAN’T?   DID!

In order to indicate that I have incorrectly filed my appeal, they must first indicate that the invalid document is valid.  CAN’T.

They will then be forced to expose that they knowingly and deliberately sent a fraudulent defective and void forged court order by mail with intent to deceive and mislead. WON’T. THIS WILL BE IGNORED because it cannot be resolved when it cannot be addressed without exposing the corruption.

The deliberate fraudulent actions of the DA and COURT ADMINISTRATION which cannot be prosecuted pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality, are clearly criminal lawless and denying my Constitutional rights and DONE IN A MANNER DESIGNED TO PREVENT ANY LAWFUL RESOLUTION.  This can only be described as TERRORISM.

[ Played this one out several times in the last 9 years.  It was a secret order in Aug 07 which started my nightmare.  It was a defective and void divorce decree lacking subject matter jurisdiction which exposes the corruption of 20 judges over 5 years and HUNDREDS OF PETITIONS.  It is that same defective and void ‘divorce decree’ which caused the fraudulent conveyance of my home.  And the inability to address their deliberate corruption which has lead to my letter to the Governor and Legislature which they call a “terroristic threat”.]

I spoke with Robert Graci of the Judicial Conduct Board yesterday.

I had wanted to speak with him for years about how Rule 1.6 Confidentiality rendered the JCB moot when judges commit and conceal acts of injustice.

My last report to JCB was hand delivered on August 1, 2013.  The dismissal of that report arrived on September 4, 2015.  OVER TWO YEARS LATER.

Mr. Graci took my call.  He attempted to suggest that the JCB was busy and he cited the volume of complaints he receives.  Horseshit.

I explained that in the 2 years they were ‘conducting the necessary review’ and ‘careful consideration’, there was no contact for further information, clarification or explanation.

I did not call to argue.  I did explain to him that I understood that the actions of the JCB were lawful.  Rule 1.6 Confidentiality prevented the JCB from addressing the injustice of a judge… even where that injustice was the culmination of the injustice by 19 other judges, with one acting to retaliate for their wrongdoing.
I mentioned to him that the same form letter had been used for ALL of the reports I made to JCB.

I explained to him how Rule 1.6 undermined his job, and the courts themselves.

I explained to him that unconstitutional Rule 1.6 caused me to have no protection of the law and causes all Constitutional rights to be ignored.

I mentioned that I had wanted to have a dialog with him about it for the last two years.

I went thru my discovery process, and then cited examples of Rule 1.6 Injustice within Pennsylvania and nationwide.  He disagreed with my findings about Rule 1.6, but was also not interested in learning more.  He also could not provide an explanation for the excuses provided by lawyers to conceal RULE 1.6 injustice.

He listened attentively to explanations and while disagreeing, he also suggested examples which might prove my findings incorrect.  Those examples were promptly addressed and explained.

I explained that I understood he could not be ‘converted’ in the phone call.  The Rules don’t permit that. It was not the point.

The 30+ minute phone call during which he attempted to poke holes in the Rule 1.6 Challenge. 

The only thing he had left was to say was he didn’t agree with me and it was not his responsibility.  He was wrong on that also. 

It is the responsibility of every lawyer to work to the betterment of JUSTICE.  That too is part of the Rules of Professional Conduct.  I explained that Rule 1.6 undermines Constitution, Law, rights, and even all the other Rules of Professional Conduct… and it does it confidentially.

There was the usual citing of Article V.  I asked him if there was a reason that the entire sentence or paragraph was never included in the citation.  The part which is left out is the part about the judiciary only having authority where the substantive rights of litigants are not affected.

He kept trying to suggest the conversation adversarial… suggesting I was trying to set him up.  I told him that was not the case at all.  I then mentioned that there were 20 judges involved in Healy v Healy which was indicative of problems.  It was necessary to review the jurisdiction of the courts, and how the courts only have jurisdiction where they follow the law.  Where a judge issued defective and void orders which are improperly enforced, Rule 1.6 conceals the lawlessness and lack of jurisdiction.  Rule 1.6 even conceals the efforts which undermine the related appeals.

We disagreed on subject matter jurisdiction, however when we talked it through the difference was the perspective on hearing a matter, and issuing a defective and void decree order without any basis in law resulting in a lapse of subject matter jurisdiction.

I told him I had waited years to have the conversation with him.  I mentioned I only filed one report per judge and that I wasn’t interested in wasting anyone’s time. 

I asked his support now that he was aware of the Constitutional issue involved.

I advised him that I would keep him in the loop on my efforts and documents which are being prepared currently.

He said he did not want that.  I told him I would include him anyway.  It would help him to perform his job responsibilities.  It wasn’t my intent to suggest that Rule 1.6 undermined the JCB completely, but clearly the JCB didn’t believe there was any responsibility for the proliferation of injustice and constitutional denials by judges.

We covered just about every aspect of Rule 1.6.

The strange thing is that the judges should have been reporting the affect as well.  THE LAWYERS SHOULD HAVE BEEN REPORTING THE AFFECT AS WELL.

Of course, if they had been reporting it…. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN CONFIDENTIALLY AND HE WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO DISCUSS IT. 

PERHAPS, I WILL GIVE MR. GRACI THE BENEFIT OF THAT DOUBT.  He did seem to comprehend and grasp the information and examples immediately.  He engaged with examples which were immediately addressed into my findings.

My hope for him is that he begins to seek to improve justice … and stop  concealing and ignoring injustice.

The victim has no other recourse but to persevere.