07.10
In the last 5 years, there has been no explanation, or justification for the actions against me. No false allegation has been presented so that I could defend against it.
I was left to feel paranoid for over three years. It was their intent. They were intentionally keeping information and documents from me. How do you get the documents when you are unaware of their existence? How do you respond? How do you defend? I have never met Judge Rhonda Daniele. She has never been assigned to the case, yet she issued a secret order against me before the first court proceeding had occurred.
– – – – – – – – – – – –
In May 2008, Judge delRicci actually repeatedly referred to me as the ‘paranoid computer guy’ in a proceeding. During that same conference, he was shown a one page document by attorney Robert Angst. It was shown to the judge in response to my request for the document which had been shown to police justifying the burglary of my home.
Judge delRicci reviewed that document, but did not permit me to see it first. I raised the issue as parties are not permitted to provide anything to the judge without first providing it to the opposing party. Judge delRicci intentionally prevented my review of the document indicating I could get the document during discovery proceedings at a civil hearing. I recall thinking,… Aren’t we having a civil proceeding now? Why does the judge expect me to file a separate action for this crime? Why does he want me to file a separate civil charge against them? And why does he want me to go to all that effort, when it should have been shown to me before it was shown to the judge.
I can tell when something is being made into a game. Judge delRicci was displaying such a tremendous disrespect for the issue before him and how it was affecting my life. Judge delRicci waited 2 months for the hearing. In the meantime, he had found the time to reschedule a support conference over 8 times, turn it into a surprise contempt hearing, and throw me in jail. he was too distracted by the ex parte chat with Bob Angst prior to that proceeding. Why was Bob there? Oh, that’s right, someone had to make sure that nothing was heard and that I was thrown in jail. I suppose I should have gotten the message on that day, that I was there to be victimized and fooled into believing that there would be justice,
CORRUPTION CONSPIRACY AND INJUSTICE.
THIS TIME WE ARE GOING TO DO IT IN FRONT OF YOU. WE HAVE NO ETHICS OR CONSCIENCE. WHEN YOU REALIZE WHAT IS BEING DONE TO YOU, LET US KNOW. WE ARE NOT GOING TO STOP, BUT WE WILL TAKE ACTION AGAINST YOU UNTIL YOU THEN REALIZE THAT YOU CANNOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.
| YES, WE ARE GOING TO LAUGH WHEN WE SEE YOU ARRIVE FOR COURT PREPARED TO PRESENT ANY ISSUE… ALL FULL OF EVIDENCE, EXHIBITS, AND THINKING JUSTICE WILL BE SERVED. |
May 2007 Short List Proceeding regarding the Plaintiff’s burglary, vandalism, breaking and entering of your home in violation of Court Orders.
1. What occurred in front of me was an inappropriate ex parte communication between Robert Angst and Judge DelRicci.
a) Ex parte, YES. It was between one party and a judge.
b) Inappropriate, YES. There was no indication that the document related to scheduling issues only.
c) Unethical, YES. The Document was a Court order which was intentionally not provided to the opposing party.
Right before your very eyes,…
Judge delRicci committed an ethics violation in allowing the ex parte communication.
Robert Angst committed an ethics violation by not providing me a copy first, and then again when it was not provided at all.
Judge delRicci then committed another ethics violation when he failed to remedy the ethics violation of Robert Angst which had been brought to his attention.
This is not just an incidental slight. It was intentional. The ethics violation, is hiding the conspiracy behind the document.
[Note to Judge Carolyn Carluccio – January 2011: I understand the issues relating to ex parte communications. I’ve watched the unethical ex parte demonstrations of Angst & Angst and the Judges assigned to the case. I’ve had 5 years of demonstrations. You and Valerie Angst may discuss what you believe I know or do not know, but it might be more productive to note that everything is written in that large pile of petitions relating to enforcement and ex parte communications which have been pending for quite a while now.]
The previous ex parte communications between Robert Angst and Judge delRicci had never occurred in an open courtroom or conference room.
It might be helpful to understand, that Judge DelRicci and Robert Angst weren’t concerned about concealing their ex parte communication. They were concealing the conspiracy to keep that document a secret since August 2007. But, there was more.
Judge DelRicci was additionally going one step further. His suggestion that I file a civil case in the matter was intentional. Any civil suit filed prior to the District Attorney commencing a criminal action in the same matter, precludes or cancels the criminal action by the State. Judge DelRici was attempting to prevent criminal charges in the burglary from being brought by the District Attorney against of the 20 or so people who were actively photographed during the burglary. The District Attorney never responded to my request to file charges.
Judge DelRicci was not concerned that the burglary had taken place in direct violation of several court orders,
Judge DelRicci was not concerned that the burglary had occurred in contempt of the Agreed Order and several other orders.
Judge DelRicci was preventing the revelation that Sonya had presented false documentation to the police.
Presenting the secret Order dated August 22, 2007 to the police when she had full knowledge that the Agreed Order of September 6, 2007 had modified the exclusive use and occupancy of the home is fraud and a criminal offense.
In presenting false documents to the police Sonya demonstrates and emphasizes that willful intent to disregard the Court Order. There was no denying that Sonya knew that her actions in burglarizing the home were in violation of a Court Order. Contempt could not be denied. She was additionally committing a pre-meditated fraud with regard to having and presenting the secret order in order to mislead the police.
In order to be found in contempt, you have to be aware that what you are doing is wrong. There must be evidence to prove that you knew what you were doing was wrong. And you have to have done it. Contempt is serious. It shows a willful disregard to disobey an Order.
Sonya had signed the Agreed Order of September 6, 2007 in open court before Judge Toby Dickman. Sonya had received a copy of the Agreed Order at the proceeding. Sonya has testified in that proceeding that she understood the statements in the document and was in agreement.
Sonya was in contempt.
In issuing a ruling on contempt, the judge’s sentence must allow a way to permit the situation to be remedied.
So the guilty party cannot be ordered to jail and to return the items, because the one action could prevents the other from occurring.
Judge DelRicci’s ruling with regard to the contempt, was an order which required the items taken be returned. The Judge then added that she could keep some of the specific items stolen.
It is an inappropriate sentence to reward someone who committed a crime against another person.
Judge delRicci was already a member of the Plaintiff’s team. It was clear.. During this proceeding the officers of the court were demonstrating their alliance right in front of you. Corruption, Conspiracy and Injustice. If you complain, you will only be victimized further. In this example, a petition regarding a burglary which you filed, provided them the opportunity to commit ethics violations and crimes against you. You sought justice, and they demonstrated that opnce you have been victimized by injustice, you will be further victimized. IN YO FACE.
| JUDGE DEL RICCI | – 2 Ethics Violations – Conspiracy to conceal a document – Obstruction of Justice – Unconstitutional Order – Civil Rights violation |
| ROBERT ANGST | – 1 Ethics Violation – Conspiracy to conceal a document – Conspiracy to commit fraud |
| Sonya Healy | – Conspiracy to commit a crime – Contempt of several Court Orders – Conspiracy to conceal a document – Fraud – Conspiracy to commit fraud – Presenting False Documents to Authorities |
This occurred in May 2008 regarding the Burglary which occurred in March 2008. This proceeding was then overloaded by 2 more petitions from Valerie Angst. It should suffice, that if they had already amassed the above list of violations for the judge to ignore, the list would only triple in size and add a First Amendment Civil Rights Violation. In that one, Judge delRicci mocked Bob Angst asking if he was aware of the First Amendment before he proceeded to issue an Order violating the Constitution. The lack of any shame of these demonstrations, clearly shows they have no fear of any accountability. Their intention was my destruction, and with the lack of conscience perhaps they were wagering if I would commit suicide before I advanced to the JADED level of their game.
They have stolen 5 years of my life and terrorized and harassed me for the entire duration. WHY? AND WHY SHOULD JUSTICE BE SERVED. Justice is locked up in the basement… and after what has been done to you, believe me. You do not want to know what they have done to her. No one has helped you in 5 years. Good luck with that.
No Comment.
Add Your Comment