A Terroristic Divorce

While the Fax machine was cooling off…

We set out to hand deliver copies of the correspondence to the state representative and senators who have local offices.

First stop, Pennsylvania Representatives Marquerite Quinn’s office. Hand delivered the following documents and reviewed the issue with a member of her staff.

– Letter to Governor Tom Corbett, Sheriffs of Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania Legislature, and the Attorney General of Pennsylvania. PDF version
– Letter to President Barack Obama. PDF version
– Letter to US Senator Toomey and Senator Casey. PDF version
– Letter to the Senators of the 113th Congress. PDF version
– Letter to the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary. PDF version
– Letter to the Sheriffs of Pennsylvania. PDF version
– Letter to the Pennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committee. PDF version
– Letter to US House of Representatives. PDF version
– Letter to US House Committee on the Judiciary. PDF version
– Letter to Governors of the US. PDF version
– Letter to Governor Tom Corbett. PDF version
– Letter to the Pennsylvania Senators. PDF version
– Letter to the Pennsylvania Representatives. PDF version

Next, Pennsylvania Representative Kathy Watson’s office. Where a discussion about the failure to schedule a meeting for almost a year lead to a long discussion of the matter and the necessity to have a discussion with Rep. Watson. Hand delivered the same series of document as above.

Next, Pennsylvania Representative Todd Stephens was caught in his office. Delivered the letters to an unaware Todd Stephens who sat down for a brief meeting. The meeting reached the point where Rep Stephens attempted to indicate that the Courts can ignore constitutional rights because the courts decide if they are ignoring your constitutional rights. NO TODD, THEY CAN’T.

IS TODD STEPHENS A COMPLETE MORON WHEN IT COMES TO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS?

REP TODD STEPHENS WAS WRONG ON EVERY LEVEL BUT MOST CERTAINLY CONSTITUTIONALLY. Upon that descent into ridonculous, the meeting ended.

Rep Todd Stephens is on the Judiciary Committee. He knows better. OR HE OUGHTA. Even in lawyer night school they surely teach that the constitution is the ‘supreme law of the land’. NOBODY CAN DENY RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

Next, A stop at Senator Greenleaf’s office. Where his Chief of Staff could be overheard to say “I DON’T WANT TO SEE HIM” – – which once overheard may explain the change of heart. Hand delivered the letters and asked AGAIN for a meeting with the Senator. Senator Greenleaf’s office and staff know me. They know how disastrous and malicious the Montgomery County judiciary have been. Yet, they just won’t schedule a meeting with the Senator.

Senator Greenleaf is the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee. He knows exactly what problem I am raising. AND HE IS AVOIDING THE ISSUE… it seems he’s been there since it was created. A knowledgeable co-conspirator?

Back to the office to check out the fax… which was taking a break after a long hard week.

August 3, 2014

Governor Tom Corbett
Sheriffs of Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania Legislature
The Attorney General of Pennsylvania

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information was applicable to the ‘Sandusky Report’. As such, the report presented a very skewed version of events because the mandate of confidentiality undermined it from any impact. For example, we present a possible disclaimer which clearly was not included with the report.

Disclaimer
The Attorney General of Pennsylvania represents the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Governor, the Attorney General’s office, various branches of the government, their agencies and their officers.
The Rules of Professional Conduct – Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION mandate confidentiality of client information where the information
– would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
– would reveal the prosecutorial misconduct of their own office,
– would expose individual liability,
– would adversely affect their client.

Office of the Attorney General
The Report from the Attorney General regarding the investigation of Gerald Sandusky may not legally present:
– anything which exposes a negative impact of the judiciary
– anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Tom Corbett
– anything which exposes misconduct of Governor Tom Corbett
– anything which exposes misconduct of Acting Attorney General William H. Ryan, Jr
– anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Linda Kelly
– anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Kathleen Kane
– anything which exposes misconduct of the Attorney General’s office
– anything which exposes misconduct of Frank Fina
– anything which exposes misconduct the Commonwealth
– anything which exposes misconduct of any state agency
– anything which exposes misconduct, participation or acts of obstruction by any of the above in their individual capacity, or as a conspiracy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 3, 2009
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on May 2, 2009
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 9, 2012
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 18, 2012
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on June 16, 2012
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on July 4, 2012
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on November 21, 2013
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to create, modify or fine tune any “LAW” regarding the Confidentiality of Email concealed within the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Report Production
Further, acting as Attorney General, Kathleen Kane contracted the creation of the report to Widener University law professor and former federal prosecutor H. Geoffrey Moulton.
(You might say “Kathleen Kane is his client.” and that the Rules of Professional Conduct mandate his confidentiality for her protection. Because, SHE IS… and IT DOES.)

Constitutionally
The Report additionally will not contain any information regarding the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 – CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION which was filed in federal court on August 8, 2013 (by two men who do not have to maintain confidentiality) seeking to restore the constitutional rights of litigants while restoring the integrity and reputation of the judiciary and the legal profession and to deliver to the legislature the ability to perform the duties of their position to responsibly manage the law.

The Challenge has been presented to President Barack Obama and the United States Congress where every level of the state and federal judiciary have ignored the clear evidence of the Courts’ denial of constitutional rights and demonstrated their own actions to prevent resolution of the matter which was served to fifty-six states attorneys general – all of whom defaulted on the matter — YET, THE COURT IGNORED THEIR DELIBERATE DEFAULT.

Political Campaign
Yes, Kathleen Kane shot her mouth off during her campaign for Attorney General of Pennsylvania,
AND
Kathleen Kane promised to investigate Attorney General Tom Corbett’s mishandling of the Sandusky case,
AND
Kathleen Kane believed Corbett to be stalling the case so it would not impact his run for Governor,
AND
Kathleen Kane was elected to the position of Attorney General,
AND
Kathleen Kane has an obligation to the People of The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

BUT, as Attorney General, these corrupt and incompetent horses asses are NOW her clients, her boss, and her staff… The RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT mandate her confidentiality.

Pennsylvania State Police
With regard to the non-participation of the Pennsylvania State Police in the preparation and assembly of this report…. Did someone tell the PA State Police that we wouldn’t publish anything they might have to say because of the confidentiality mandate? The State Police participation would have potentially required a great deal of redaction and editing.

The Pennsylvania State Police do NOT have a Confidentiality Mandate. If they were to issue a report, it would be different.

1.6 Confidentiality of Information – While the Model Rule 1.6(a) duty of confidentiality is closely related to the attorney-client privilege, it is broader in scope than the attorney-client privilege, “which is a rule of evidence,” or “the work product immunity which is a rule of procedure.”

Rule 1.6 causes a mandated confidentiality of information regarding injustice and judicial corruption.

This was demonstrated in Luzerne County where Kids For Cash was IGNORED by every judge, district attorney, prosecutor and lawyer… until Judge Ann Lokuta violated the law and called the FBI to report Ciavarella et al. Ann Lokuta was disciplined and removed from the bench for her violations of Rule 1.6.

The Foreclosure Crisis nationwide was caused similarly by an ACT OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT resulting in the loss of constitutional rights and the loss of homes to fraudulent actions filed by lawyers (and judges) MANDATED to maintain confidentiality.

THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS LET THIS HAPPEN TO MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.

Rule 1.6 mandates that an Attorney General ignore judicial corruption and injustice
– without regard for the number of children improperly incarcerated by a judge,
– without regard for the number of homes foreclosed upon using fraudulent documents,
– without regard for basic constitutional, civil and human rights,
– without regard for the denial of equal protection of the law,
– without regard for the law,
– without regard for an oath of office,
– without regard for ethics or morality, and
– without mercy for the victims overwhelmed, destitute and pushed to their limits who commit suicide.

Rule 1.6 DELIBERATELY PREVENTS LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL…

You attention to this matter of national importance is anticipated and expected. We are available to meet with you at any time to discuss this issue at length. Please contact us directly.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim