A Terroristic Divorce

First and foremost, the allegations in the complaint are false.

1. There was no threat. My words are being wrapped in a false story.

2. My web site was hacked. This is documented.

3. The tools used to hack the website are now being used to interfere with my effort to prepare to face the charges.

As I prepare the data and organize, the computer is indicating interference. Errors, security holes, crashes, programming errors – all indicate a further intrusion.

Not only is the deck stacked against me, everything I do is known to people who can file further false charges to undermine my effort. The more successful I am in my preparation, the more I am at risk of further hacking or further improper police actions and another false arrest.

It is necessary that I do my preparation, store it on a remote server, and permit other people to know and see the facts, because otherwise it can be deleted or affected at any instant.

These are issues which I am familiar with because I have been experiencing the intrusive effects with the technology since 2007. There is no escaping the intrusion. There can be no assistance where redirection and obfuscation methods are available to undermine the facts.

One difference is that NOW – after the revelations of Edward Snowden – people know this software’s stealth ability is very REAL. They would still be shocked to learn how the technology provides the ability for misuse. To avoid embarassment, misuse any is covered up, non-disclosed, confidential, or lied about.

Detection only serves to educate and inform about the abilities of the program and the various methods which can be misused to undermine review and preparation for Court. Lawyers are aware of the technology and take measures to protect themselves from intrusions by other lawyers, or other organizations.

INJUSTICE MANDATED BY UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

Rule 1.6 mandates non-disclosure even where fraud is being committed to conceal a prior fraud. Even where fraud is being used to prevent the situation from being rectified. Lawyers and Courts are ignoring the Rule of Law and the Constitution – an improperly enacted unconstitutional law REQUIRES them to conceal their fraud and corruption. Requires them to sacrifice their integrity and deny justice. Prevents them from revealing the cause is ONE LAW – the same number – the same name – improperly enacted in EVERY STATE. There was no construction by any state Legislature. There was no signature by any state Governor. The Courts enacted this IN EVERY STATE over 30 years – 1984 to 2009 – when provided by the American Bar Association. The unconstitutional law prevents the courts from fixing it. A Federal law – McDade-Murtha – prevents federal investigators and government attorneys from action. They are mandated to follow the ethics rules in the jurisdiction (state) where they are working. Congress neglected to notice the lack of ethics in the state laws. The lawyers, including attorneys general, who testified before Congress indicated that passage of the amendment would be “disasterous.” Rule 1.6 likely prevented them from disclosing their reasoning. Federal Courts are similarly undermined by the inclusion through the local rules for each District Court, and each Court of Appeals. Under Rule 1.6, a lawyer or judge must interfere, ignore or commit fraud to prevent disclosure of the denial of the Rule of Law and the Constitution.

Once recognized to be unconstitutional, the Attorney General was no longer mandated to non-disclosure and lawfully permitted to address the issue. It seems that the law was then re-caste into a direct court order to silence and prevent the Pennsylvania Attorney General from any action or exposure.

IT IS KNOWN THAT…
Unidentified courts have issued confidential orders mandating that Kathleen Kane neglect investigation and performance of the duties of the Attorney General who is the top law enforcement officer in the state. The ‘personal’ approach is intended to avoid notice by the Legislature and the Governor that the Courts have undermined the proper law which defines the Office of the Attorney General and the duties and responsibilities of the Attorney General. An extreme violation of separation of powers. A demonstration which usurps all governmental authority within the state.

WHILE THIS TWISTED ‘GAME’ PLAYS OUT…
My Life has been constant terror. I am further victimized with no explanation or communication from the Attorney General about the negligence, the failure to act. IGNORED. At the same time Kathleen Kane (the person) is facing liability for her failure, her delay and her participation in a conspiracy which denies and prevents people’s rights. There is no immunity to deny an American of their Constitutional rights OR for participation in a conspiracy which undermines the Rule of Law and the US Constitution.

How do I address a secret order from an unidentified court which is causing my continued terror. Without any protection of the Rule of Law and the Constitution, the victim is further victimized. There is no escape from further injustice and terror.

The suggestion that I would commit the crimes alleged in the Complaint and Arrest Warrant is foolishness. Without any protection of the law and with my constitutional rights ignored, the awareness of the risk is terrifying. The jeopardy I face is not imagined.

---

Rule 1.6 inescapable injustice is triggered by an act of misconduct or injustice which is held confidential. The ongoing MANDATED efforts which deny, avoid and prevent disclosure can quickly become MASSIVE in comparison to the initial event.

– Nine Years. Over 20 Judges of the Montgomery County Judiciary. Prolonged litigation of cases. Three Appeals to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. A Constitutional Challenge filed in Federal Court and served to EVERY state attorney general. An Appeal to the Third Circuit Federal Court.

– Persistent litigation based on void orders and false allegations with over $300,000 in fines and fees because the court could not address the void order, nor the false allegations, nor the perjury involved.

– Exacerbated by the sixteenth judge assigned to the case acting in the clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction and contrary to established law issuing a defective and void order then refusing to address or correct the defect while preventing an appeal to the Superior Court CAUSING THE LOSS OF JUDICIAL IMMUNITY FOR THE ENTIRE JUDICIAL BENCH.

That judge was also the president of the county bar association at the time, and is married to the special prosecutor in charge of a grand jury which has threatened and silenced Attorney General Kathleen Kane.

The law did not apply. Constitutional rights were ignored. Custody ignored, hearings delayed with visitation ignored. Perpetual fraudulent allegations of contempt. No unemployment. No welfare. No health insurance. No employment. Constant technology intrusions. Robbery. Aggressive Child Support enforcement (against an unemployed father). Jailed for contempt of an unsigned court order where hearings were delayed. Where the strict enforcement of EVERY court order against me was countered by the dismissal and failure to enforce EVERY court order on my behalf with all perjury and contempt ignored. Annihilation of every aspect of my personal, professional and financial existence.

---

BEGINNING:
A confirmed computer/technology intrusion was being concealed by private investigators and by false reports to multiple levels of law enforcement…

After being properly reported to police, county, state and federal law enforcement, ALL refused to investigate or explain.

The intrusion was ABSOLUTELY CONFIRMED by a police officer. The officer was then directed to humiliate and embarrass the target… removing the target from his home… The officer confirmed his knowledge of the software by pictures shown to other people. This was later denied while all police reported were prevented.

After preparing voluntary commitment papers and coercing my agreement under a false pretense of concern…

(En route to MCES) the officer rewrotes the paperwork to have me involuntarily committed…

The justification too weak, the officer further modified the re-written paperwork to suggest the target was planning to bomb a local mall… this ‘headline’ clearly written as an afterthought in the margin.

THAT REQUESTED DOCUMENT was missing from the paid request for the file contents.
(Apparently, they were unaware that a courtesy copy had been provided when I left the facility.)

---

An August 2007 secret order concealed by a judge who had never been assigned to the case, who was connected to the MCES facility, issued without any hearing, that order not distributed to all parties, the order never docketed was filed by the prothonotary in a folder separate from the case file, the secret order presented to police to permit burglary in violation of a valid order, the secret order presented to another judge in a conference BUT I was denied a copy when requested AND denied permission to review it. The existence of the document was repeatedly denied in discovery attempts.

After leveraging and undermining every proceeding for three years… The secret order was inadvertently handed to me in a separate case file. I immediately called it to the attention of the clerk, the Supervisor, Deputy and the Prothonotary, Mark Levy. When asked for an explanation, not oner judge responded. The Judicial Conduct Board dismissed all complaints.

The continued neglect to follow the rule of law, the Constitution, the deliberate neglect of court procedure and protocol further demonstrated by abusive and deliberate failure of due process which resulted in the lack of jurisdiction for the Court. There was no requirement for the lawyers to comply with any law, order, service or instruction… my non-waiver repeatedly indicated verbally and in writing to the court.

---

That Police Officer, in July 2007, had indicated he could take no action. He instructed me to contact the FBI.

On August 7, 2007, after I had discovered, confirmed and secured evidence of the intrusion technology further confirmed by the software company. Officer Gerald Dougherty arrived under a false pretense which I immediately knew to be a lie.

We discussed the information learned in the interim, all the while he was in possession of a screen shot of my computer. He knew the person(s) responsible for the surveillance who sent him to address a ‘perceived’ threat. After months of stress, there would be some relief. But, there wasn’t.

A threat which was no threat. A purported threat which had never been communicated in any way, nor saved, nor printed. A note on the computer screen indicated the impending failure of the hard disk in the computer. The screenshot had been shown to my brother by Officer Dougherty. Upon request for a copy, my brother was denied and told there was no picture. My brother had described the computer screen to me and was within a quarter inch of the size, exact layout of the screen including font variations.

Officer Dougherty chose to abuse his authority under color of law with the deliberate intent to cause emotional distress in the furtherance of a conspiracy which proceeded to undermine my life, placing myself and everyone I came into contact with in jeopardy.

The technology intrusions continued with a vengeance – detected and ignored by every level of law enforcement. Escalating with more aggressive psychological (Psy Ops) tactics. Tampering with cars, stalking, use of technologies which could be detected but not found or removed. Unable to escape the terror inflicted. Once detected and exposed, I documented my experience while continuing to be prevented from any relief or removal.

The extreme experience defied any explanation as to why every lawyer; every judge; every politician; every level of local, county, state and federal law enforcement had IGNORED my pleas for assistance without any explanation for their deliberate negligence of my case. Documented since 2007.

---

In July 2013, I recognized Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information provided an explanation for my being ignored. Every instance. EVERY. Cross referenced throughout the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.6 provided an excuse for everyone mandated by it to apply non-disclosure and confidentiality while ignoring the law and the constitution. The collateral unconstitutional affect had never been addressed publicly, or challenged constitutionally.

For Federal Standing, it was necessary to experience and survive the unconstitutional injustice.
– Find the unconstitutional law distributed throughout the Rules of Professional Conduct.
– Recognize that it was improperly enacted by the state supreme court.
(Article V Section 10(c) does NOT allow the courts to enact a laws which affect substantive rights of a litigant.)
– A lawyer could not represent you in the action – the law mandates their fraud to conceal it – a deliberate consequence caused when the fraud provisions were removed from Rule 1.6 by the American bar Association.
– The state Attorney General had to have a way of providing the relief requested. While mandated by Rule 1.6 non-disclosure, the Attorney General could default in the Constitutional Challenge. The Judge, also mandated to non-disclosure, could then grant the Default. Rule 1.6 would be indicated as unconstitutional while those mandated by non-disclosure followed the law right up until indicated it was NO LAW.
(Lawyers committing fraud prevented this outcome, filing late documents, accepted, unexcused and unsubstantiated. A judge could possibly rule upon his recognition of unconstitutionality, BUT never provided the opportunity where interference with the administration of justice and fraud by the lawyers within the court staff is confidential and not disclosed pursuant to Rule 1.6.

THE ACTIONS WHICH UNDERMINE THE JUDICIARY AND INTERFERE WITH THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE WHILE DENYING THE RULE OF LAW AND THE US CONSTITUTION ARE IGNORED BY FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MANDATED BY THE MCDADE MURTHA AMENDMENT TO FOLLOW THE LOCAL ETHICS RULES which lack any ethics.

AND NOW IN 2015 comes another allegation of a purported threat…

The paperwork indicates that Dougherty is
– the Charging Officer
– the Affiant
– the Accuser
– the Requester of the Arrest Warrant
– the Person who swore to the Information
– the Arresting Officer
– the Police manufactured the purported threat
– the Police communicated the threat

I made no threat. I made no communication.

DOUGHERTY DID. ALL OF IT. THE HACK TO MY WEB SITE… a vulgar 3-4 phrases.
(You have read this far… do you think I communicate anything in 3-4 phrases? NEVER HAPPENED YET.)

After surviving 9 years of non-stop terror and harassment and isolation and hundred of vexatious petitions, THE FACT THAT I HAVE NOT MADE ANY THREATS demonstrates the strength of my character.

I do not know where my ability to persevere comes from.

Judge Duffy witnessed the strange effect that this case had on her court administrator. She had never witnessed behavior like that before – The denial of access to the courts. The experience was confirmed and corroborated by other Montgomery County officials. That was two years ago. Now I am purportedly making threats. (Conditions of bail prevent specifics.)

I am following procedures and law. Throughout the site, I explain the law behind every action and every effort.

People who lie do not understand people who follow the law. They cannot comprehend the concept.

Twisting the service of court documents into a reported threat is extortion and an attempt to deny protected rights. It is an attempt to prevent my exercise of the right to seek relief from the court. When you have no rights, this happens.

While there are moments of frustration, it is the fear that overwhelms my emotions. My divorce which left a man with nothing – no protection of the law – no constitutional rights.

Because of Officer Dougherty. I have been terrorized and fearful since 2007.

Judge Duffy knew that I was concerned about requiring immediate eviction of a family caught in the middle. I went to her court for that reason – not to the police. To give people notice and opportunity to prepare. Court administration lawyers interfered pursuant to Rule 1.6 – excused fraud in the furtherance.

Rule 1.6 has persisted in undermining the integrity of the courts. The judiciary cannot seem to recognize that I am trying to survive an injustice which was deliberate and undermined the entire judiciary at state and federal levels.

My motives are true and genuine and personal. I need to restore protection of the rule of law and my constitutional rights. As a result, the judiciary will not have to sacrifice their integrity to conceal crimes of other judges. AND Lawyers won’t be ashamed as they are mandated to coverup the crimes of other lawyers who demean the reputation of the profession.

Americans have failed to recognize JUSTICE IS IMPORTANT. THE US CONSTITUTION IS IMPORTANT.

The Injustice in the USA is ignored BECAUSE OF RULE 1.6

You do not want to ever learn what life is like without the law and any rights. I pray you don’t. If they destroy me it may be another thirty years until someone has standing to address it.

Do you honestly think that someone that knows the fragility and risk and fear would commit this crime?
– someone who experienced the humiliation and character assassination of THIS EXACT EXPERIENCE NINE YEARS AGO BY THE SAME POLICE OFFICER…
– someomeone who persevered and rose to the occasion which was manipulated against him to further terrorize and slander…
– someone who still followed procedure and the law…
– someone who experienced the complete failure of the rule of law and the US constitution at every level of the state and federal judiciary

I am communicating to every level of government. People are being shot dead, incarcerated, destroyed with no accountability once a lawyer invokes CONFIDENTALITY.

Where this could have been resolved at 7 weeks in 2007… IT HAS BEEN 9 YEARS. 9 YEARS.
I have no need to threaten. The US Constitution and the Rule of Law will prevail.

---

I DEMAND THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION/TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OF OFFICER DOUGHERTY FOR TERRORISTIC HARASSMENT UNDER COLOR OF LAW WITH INTENT TO INFLICT EMOTIONAL DISTRESS; AND FOR FALSE SWEARING BEFORE JUDGE DUFFY.

I DEMAND A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT BE PROCESSED AGAINST OFFICER DOUGHERTY AND THAT AN ATTORNEY FOR THE COMMONWEALTH SIGN OFF ON MY PRIVATE COMPLAINT OR INDICATE REASONS THE COMPLAINT IS IGNORED.

EVERY CRIMINAL COMPLAINT HAS BEEN IGNORED SINCE 2007 WHEN SUBMITTED BY PHONE, FORM AND LETTER TO POLICE, DETECTIVES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND EVERY ATTORNEY IN THAT COUNTY OFFICE. NOT ONE RESPONSE OR PROSECUTION.
– COMPUTER/TECHNOLOGY INTRUSION
– IDENTITY THEFT
– BURGLARY
– CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS
– ABUSE OF POWER UNDER COLOR OF LAW
– FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE*
– EXTORTION – FALSE CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS MADE UPON RECEIPT OF COURT DOCUMENTS*
– AND MANY OTHERS
I DEMAND THE INFORMATION AS TO WHY THERE HAS NOT BEEN ONE RESPONSE, OR EXPLANATION, OR INVESTIGATION, OR PROSECUTION. (* Warrington Township Police in Bucks County were included in these reports.)

I DEMAND THAT THE LOCAL RULE WHICH PERMITS A POLICE OFFICER TO REPEATEDLY TERRORIZE A PERSON WITHOUT REVIEW BY AN ATTORNEY FOR THE COMMONWEALTH BE IMMEDIATELY REVOKED AS IT CAUSES THE DENIAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF AN INDIVIDUAL.

I DEMAND A FORMAL WRITTEN PUBLIC APOLOGY FOR PLACING MY LIFE, AND THE LIFE OF MY MOTHER, IN IMMINENT DANGER DURING THE EXECUTION OF AN ARREST WARRANT ISSUED AFTER INFORMATION WAS FALSELY SWORN BEFORE JUDGE ANDREA DUFFY.

I DEMAND THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW AND THAT RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES PROTECTED BY THE US CONSTITUTION BE RESPECTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED.

I DEMAND THE IMMEDIATE REVOCATION OF RULE 1.6 OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AM IMPROPERLY ENACTED UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW WHICH IS REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

I DEMAND THE IMMEDIATE ACCEPTANCE AND DECLARATION OF THE DEFAULT BY FIFTY-SIX STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6 AND AN ORDER INDICATING THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF RULE 1.6 IN EVERY STATE WITH IMMEDIATE ATTENTION BY EVERY STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO ADDRESS THE INJUSTICE UNCONSTITUTIONALLY CONCEALED BY THIS REPUGNANT ABOMINATION.

I DEMAND THE IMMEDIATE FEDERAL AND STATE PROSECUTION OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION AND EVERY AFFILIATED ORGANIZATION INVOLVED IN THE SEDITION AND CONSPIRACY WHICH HAS UNDERMINED THE AUTHORITY AND INTEGRITY OF THE AMERICAN JUDICIARY AND USURPED AND AFFECTED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.

I DEMAND CAKE WITH PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA AND FIRST LADY MICHELLE OBAMA AT THE WHITE HOUSE IN WASHINGTON DC WHERE THE PRESIDENT WILL ANNOUNCE THE END OF THIS PERIOD OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL INJUSTICE IGNORED UNDER REPUGNANT RULE 1.6 AND THE US CONSTITUTION REBOOTED WITH JUSTICE FOR ALL AND SINCERE EFFORTS TOWARD PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION TO UNFUCK WHAT THE LAWYERS HAVE DESTROYED.

EVERY PERSON MATTERS. MAY GOD HAVE MERCY AND BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.