A Terroristic Divorce

Justice Scalia didn’t just say the majority was wrong or misguided; he essentially said they had conspired to overthrow our form of government. His position on the Court ( Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information ) has made it impossible to supply specifics.

The suggested possible explanation of what he meant is that he saw a conflict-of-interest on the part of members of the majority, which required their recusal from the case.  Rule 1.6 nondisclosure requires misinformation from lawyers.   The judicial branch of government which has been accorded The Public Trust, and which has no  reason for secrecy, is concealing that it has been undone by an improperly enacted unconstitutional law enacted by EVERY state judiciary due to lobbying by the American Bar Association – injustice is their GOLDMINE.

Rather than investigate what Scalia is hinting at, the media have opened fire on Scalia for blowing the whistle on judicial corruption.

Justice Scalia is pointing at Rule 1.6 which has been demonstrated and proven unconstitutional and the reason for continuing injustice.

The constitutional case was suppressed and obstructed in the Eastern District of PA.   When exposed in the Superior Court of PA, the courts ordered PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane to silently participate in the conspiracy to obstruct justice… and then Montgomery County attacked the AG for investigating the evidence which was concealed by a grand jury to prevent exposure of the nationwide problem. Rule 1.6 is in every state.

Look up THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6.
Or
Healy, Krautheim v Attorney General Kathleen Kane and the Attorneys General of the United States

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/celebrate-the-4th-impeach-kagan-and-ginsburg/