09.02
The general apathy about PORNgate emails fails to recall recent Pennsylvania History… and another witch hunt which annihilated the reputation of Penn State’s Joe Paterno.
Paterno could never have done anything about Sandusky. His career, reputation and legacy were sacrificed for the sake of public appearance.
The PORNgate emails released last week were part of a collection by those SAME investigators who were S-L-O-W to prosecute Jerry Sandusky. Pervs of a feather?
The Attorney General has an attorney-client relationship with the personnel in the Office of the Attorney General. As such, Kathleen Kane could not reveal the misdeeds, negligence and sabotage of the people in her office… BUT she can fire them. SO SHE DID.
Consider the following…
Who Is The Client of the government attorney? The general consensus is that there are five possible answers to the question:
– Public
– Government as a whole
– Branch of government in which employed
– Particular agency or department
– Responsible officers who make decisions with an agency or department
MORE INFO: WHO IS YOUR CLIENT? ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS
Remember when the anticipated Sandusky Report FAILED TO EXPOSE ANY WRONGDOING previous of
– Attorney General Tom Corbett, who became Governor Tom Corbett,
– a series of interim Attorneys General and
– the staff in the Office of the Attorney General.
The Attorney General has an obligation of non-disclosure for the misdeeds, negligence and sabotage of HER CLIENTS. The DISCLAIMER for the report could not indicate or explain that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality REQUIRED the Attorney General to conceal the misdeeds, negligence and sabotage of her CLIENTS.
MORE INFO: ABOUT THAT SANDUSKY REPORT: THE UNPUBLISHED DISCLAIMER
Not so long ago… There was a scandal in the Luzerne County Courthouse where Judges were incarcerating children and receiving kickbacks. Thousands of children were affected. Denied the Rule of Law. Denied their Constitutional Rights. For low grade ‘offenses’ children were jailed for months and years.
The silence of Luzerne County Law Enforcement.
The silence of the Luzerne County Judiciary.
The silence of the Luzerne County Lawyers.
The silence of The Wilkes-Barre Law and Library Association. (The official name of the Luzerne County Bar Association.)
The failure of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to intervene.
The failure of the Judicial Conduct Board to act.
The failure of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to act.
The deliberate misrepresentation, neglect and cover-up of WHAT CONCEALED THE CORRUPTION by the InterBranch Commission on Juvenile Justice.
THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL TERROR OF THE FAMILIES IN LUZERNE COUNTY… BY LAWYERS… with a mandate of Confidentiality.
When Judge Ann Lokuta exposed the scandal and corruption to federal authorities, she was disciplined for breaking the silence and removed from the bench.
Federal Authorities were prevented from prosecuting the KIDS FOR CASH judges for their actual constitutional violations. They were prosecuted on failure to pay taxes on their ill-gotten gains.
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality prevented the federal lawyers from prosecuting the full crimes of the judiciary. Judicial immunity was ‘suggested’ but can not afford immunity for denial of rights protected by the Constitution of the United States.
The McDade-Murtha Amendment was passed in the US Congress which requires ALL FEDERAL INVESTIGATORS AND LAWYERS to follow the Rules of Professional Conduct within the jurisdiction where they are working. Pennsylvania’s Rule 1.6 Confidentiality prevented, silenced and undermined the entire Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and all other federal agencies.
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information was enacted by EVERY STATE SUPREME COURT gradually from 1984 (New Jersey) to 2009 (Maine). Improperly and Unconstitutionally. The American Bar Association was the author, and lobbied every state supreme court to enact their Rules of Professional Conduct (including Rule 1.6) into law.
| The American Bar Association deliberately removed ‘the fraud provisions’ from Rule 1.6 when they were drafting their Model Rules of Professional Conduct. This was done against the very strong and very vocal warnings of the head of the commission drafting the Model Rules. When Robert Kutek died suddenly in January 1983, the membership removed the fraud provisions from Rule 1.6. This deletion made the Model Rules unethical, unlawful, unconstitutional, immoral and ABSOLUTELY CONFIDENTIAL.
It is unclear whether it was irony or spite where the commission was then named THE KUTEK COMMISSION after the man who challenged the lawyers on their deliberate failure to consider the ramifications of deleted ‘fraud provisions’ from their Model Rules. |
It has been suggested that the National Security Agency (NSA) was created to maintain surveillance on Americans and to take preventative efforts and actions which would continue to conceal that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality had undermined the judiciary in every state.
JUSTICE is an essential part of American Government. It is the FIRST order of business in the preamble of the US Constitution.
“Establish Justice”
Ignoring the denial of constitutional rights has become OBVIOUS nationwide. Edward Snowden was able to expose what was happening at the NSA but was prevented from any explanation of WHY. The explanations offered by the NSA were seen as misinformed and divisive distractions.
The efforts of lawyers in state and federal government and the news media to conceal actions surrounding improperly enacted and unconstitutional Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information are prevented from disclosure by Rule 1.6 itself.
Those efforts by lawyers can include a further denial of access to the courts and interference with the administration of justice. AND THOSE EFFORTS which can include fraud in the furtherance and fraud to prevent rectificaton are held confidential and concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.
The unconstitutional, lawless, fraudulent and corrupt efforts by lawyers in the court clerks offices are organized by the affiliated bar associations which exist in every major state and federal jurisdiction.
Rule 1.6 mandates nondisclosure which prevents lawyers from exposing the cause of the Constitutional Crisis. Most lawyers have accepted the injustice and been improperly convinced that Rule 1.6 is Attorney Client Privilege. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality has considerably broader application than ACP.
ALL CONFIDENTIALITY FOR THE ENTIRE STATE AND FEDERAL JUDICIARY, EVERY COURT and THE LEGAL PROFESSION NATIONWIDE is addressed within identical or basically similar versions of Rule 1.6 in every state in the US.
ONE UNCONSTITUTIONAL RULE HAS CAUSED THE CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IN THE UNITED STATES.
AMERICAN INJUSTICE IGNORED
The Foreclosure Crisis in the US was driven by fraudulent, forged and robo-signed deeds filed in foreclosure actions involving over 45 million Americans. Those affected discovered that LAWS did not apply while their constitutional rights were ignored and denied without explanation. The American public questioned why no one was prosecuted for the crimes, the fraud, the forgeries. Rule 1.6 non-disclosure prevented lawyers and law enforcement from revealing OR EVEN ADDRESSING the fraud of their clients (or themselves).
Too many times we have seen District Attorneys stand before the American Public to address police officers who have killed people. The District Attorney, a lawyer, fails to indicate that the police officer is their client. As such, attorney-client privilege prevents disclosure of information which would adversely affect their client.
The apparent Injustice has resulted in demonstrations, violence and riots across the United States. The efforts which misinform and attempt to assign blame based on sex, race, creed, sexuality, nationality, country of origin, etc… only serve to divide the American people who desperately want to believe there is an explanation for what is occurring.
THE EXPLANATION EXISTS.
However, the explanation is prevented by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.
The Problem within Rule 1.6 Confidentiality is it’s own mandate of nondisclosure which prevents lawyers from addressing the problem and actively conceals their actions to prevent the constitutional issue from being addressed.
The explanation is that an unconstitutional CONFIDENTIALITY law has been improperly enacted by EVERY state judiciary and the same law prevents the judiciary from disclosing that they have been undone.
Permit me to explain. I AM NOT A LAWYER.
I am not bound by Lawyer Confidentiality which undermines the Rule of Law, the Constitution of the United States and the independence of the Judicial branch of state and federal government.
I am the victim who has survived, documented and persevered through the extreme terror of unconstitutional injustice ignored by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality
I HAVE BEEN DENIED PROTECTION OF THE LAW.
I HAVE BEEN DENIED RIGHTS SECURED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED ACTIONS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT WHICH NEGLECTED THE RULE OF LAW AND ALL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED TWO (2) DISTRICT ATTORNEYS IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA WHO HAVE NEGLECTED THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE LAW AND THE CONSTITUTION
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ENDURING 20 JUDGES CONDUCTING PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT LAWFUL JURISDICTION AND DUE PROCESS ISSUING ORDERS WHICH ARE NOT SUBSTANTIATED BY LAW OR SUPPORTED BY FACTS.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED DEFECTIVE AND VOID COURT ORDERS WHICH LACK SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION WHICH ARE ENFORCED WITH AGGRESSION AND MALICE WHILE FAILING TO ADDRESS THE DEFECTIVE ORDERS
I HAVE BEEN INCARCERATED FOR CONTEMPT REGARDING THE ENFORCEMENT OF A NON-EXISTENT CHILD SUPPORT ORDER. TACKLED, SHACKLED AND FORCIBLY REMOVED FROM THE COURTROOM AND HELD HOSTAGE FOR $5000 BAIL.
I HAVE BEEN DENIED ENFORCEMENT OF VALID SIGNED SUPPORT ORDERS BY THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS UNIT.
I HAVE BEEN DENIED ACCESS TO A FILE ABOUT ME IN THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS UNIT.
THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS UNIT HAS DELETED FROM THEIR SYSTEM DOCUMENTS PROPERLY FILED BY AN ATTORNEY AND SERVED UPON THE PARTIES AND THE COURT.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED JUDICIAL RETALIATION WITH EXTREME MALICE FOR PETITIONING THE COURT TO ADDRESS THE LACK OF JURISDICTION IN A DEFECTIVE AND VOID DIVORCE DECREE.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE FRAUD, LIES, MISREPRESENTATION AND DISRESPECT OF EVERY OFFICE IN THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTHOUSE. WITHIN FAMILY COURT ADMINISTRATION THEIR PARTICIPATION IN WAS COERCED UNDER EXTREME DURESS AT THE INSTRUCTION OF JUDGES..
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WHERE COURT STAFF INTERCEPTED, INTERFERED AND FORGED DOCUMENTS WITH REGARD TO APPEALS FROM THE LOWER COURTS.
I HAVE BEEN DENIED AND PREVENTED FILED DOCUMENTS AND ORDERS DIRECTLY RELATING TO THE APPEALS IN THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FROM PHILADELPHIA AND BUCKS COUNTIES AND THEIR FAILURE TO ADDRESS THE VIOLATIONS OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS BY THE SUPERIOR COURT STAFF.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE US ATTORNEY AND HIS FAILURE TO ADDRESS THE CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS AND FEDERAL CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST ME.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE NON-RESPONSE OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL INSPECTORS TO THE REPORTED USE OF THE MAIL TO COMMIT FRAUD BY THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT STAFF.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SILENCE FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL REGARDING RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO ADDRESS CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE COMPLETE FAILURE OF THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD TO ADDRESS THE CORRUPTION WITHIN GHT EMONTGOMERY COUNTY JUDICIARY.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL NEGLECT OF THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WITH REGARD TO VIOLATIONS OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT BY LAWYERS WITHIN COURT ADMINISTRATION, LAWYERS IN THE CLERKS OFFICES OF COUNTY STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS AND LAWYERS EMPLOYED BY LITIGANTS.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE FAILURE AT ALL LEVELS OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TO TAKE ANY ACTION REGARDING CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST ME. Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA), Secret Service, Federal Marshall Service, Pennsylvania State Police, Montgomery County Detectives, Montgomery County Sheriff Department, Montgomery Township Police, Warrington Township Police, Upper Gwynedd Township Police,
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WHERE COURT STAFF INTERCEPTED AND PREVENTED ACCESS TO THE JUDICIARY.
I HAVE WITNESSED THE SHOCK ON THE FACE OF PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNOR TOM CORBETT WHEN I INTRODUCED MYSELF AND HAND DELIVERED A DOCUMENT ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE MISINFORMATION, DELIBERATE NEGLECT AND FRAUD OF GOVERNOR TOM CORBETT’S OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL.
I HAVE FILED A CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AND SERVED IT UPON FIFTY SIX (56) ATTORNEYS GENERAL TO ADDRESS THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF RULE 1.6 IN EVERY STATE.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE DELIBERATE FAILURE BY THE CLERKS IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TO FOLLOW THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SUCCESS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6 WHERE FIFTY-SIX ATTORNEYS GENERAL DELIBERATELY DEFAULTED IN THE MATTER BEFORE THE FEDERAL COURT.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THAT SUCCESS UNDONE BY FRAUDULENT ACTIONS NEGLECTING FEDERAL LAWS AND RULES OF PROCEDURE AND WHERE FORGED DOCUMENTS WERE UNSUBSTANTIATED … THE LAWYERS/CLERKS IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INTERCEPTED AND PREVENTED ACCESS TO THE JUDICIARY.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE DELIBERATE FAILURE BY THE CLERKS IN THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS TO FOLLOW THE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE WHERE THEIR ACTIONS INTERCEPTED AND PREVENTED ACCESS TO THE JUDICIARY.
I HAVE BEEN DENIED PUBLIC ASSISTANCE, HEALTH CARE and SUPPORT.
In February 2015 I sought the assistance of the Governor of Pennsylvania Tom Wolf, the Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, and EVERY MEMBER of the state Legislature to regain the lawful possession of my home.
The corrupted and Rule 1.6 tainted Montgomery County judiciary had improperly indicated a lack of jurisdiction with prejudice – intended to prevent me from further effort to regain my home.
The Appeal to the Superior Court intercepted by the lawyers in the clerks office indicated that the lower court decision was affirmed in a forged unsigned ORDER mailed from the court.
The Court had improperly indicated a lack of jurisdiction. I contacted the Legislature to address the ‘gap’ in the jurisdiction of the court.
I contacted the Governor and Attorney General as the Executive branch is responsible for enforcement of the law.
The Courts had improperly removed themselves from any further involvement regarding possession of the home. Rule 1.6 prevents the courts from exposing the corruption of the Montgomery County judiciary.
A defective and void order at the center of the matter had been unlawfully issued by Carolyn Torneta Carluccio.
Judge Carluccio proceeded to prevent the Appeal of her defective order from the Superior Court.
Judge Carluccio aggressively and maliciously retaliated at her defective and void order being documented with the court for correction and exposed. The defective and void order remains unaddressed.
Judge Carlucio was the 16th judge in the matter of Healy v Healy.
Where the defective and void ORDER lacked SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE ONLY SITUATION WHICH NEGATES JUDICIAL IMMUNITY APPLIED to ALL judges in the matter.
JUDGE CARLUCCIO’S HUSBAND WAS THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR IN THE ALLEGED LEAK CASE AGAINST KATHLEEN KANE.
Recall, Kathleen Kane had been PERSONALLY ordered by secret orders from unidentified courts to neglect the responsibilities of her office.
When the Attorney General attempted to investigate the unconstitutional issues related to the Appeal in the Superior Court pursuant to Rule 521 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Discovery that parts of the court record in the case which were not forwarded to the Superior Court, as required, had been sealed through the improper actions and manipulations of an investigative Grand Jury.
The Montgomery County machine had demonstrated a terroristic level of corruption. Their effort to conceal the unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality is boundless and will strike at anyone.
SO THEY DID.
I was arrested on March 13, 2015 for a purported terroristic threat in my letter to the Governor.
The ‘threatened’ proceeded to document a delusional and incoherent five page document which planned, provisioned and trained for my execution. This document is undoubtedly a TERRORISTIC THREAT… by the people who stole my home… who had used the court documents indicating their fraudulent conveyance to claim a $400,000 settlement from the title insurance.
Within a month, a document indicating the satisfaction of their $400,000 mortgage was filed with the Recorder of Deeds.
Exposing the ruthless and terroristic tactics used by the Montgomery County District Attorney’s Office to ignore and conceal their negligence and constitutional denials further raised the issue of the volume of murder suicides ending cases within the Court of Common Pleas which were all concealed pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of information.
Exposing an egregious system of unconstitutional injustice which has existed and been concealed in Pennsylvania since 1987 threatened to expose a MASSIVE VIOLATION OF THE PUBLIC TRUST orchestrated by the American Bar Association and its affiliate organizations in every state.
WHEN YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS AND NO PROTECTION OF THE LAW… YOU HAVE NO ESCAPE.
I had no other choice but to discover the source of unconstitutional injustice ignored and to persevere.
I had not anticipated that the ABA members who profited by taking advantage of Americans attempting to survive or escape silent injustice, had initiated a program whjich undermined the judicial branch in every state and federally.
AN UNIMAGINABLE VIOLATION OF THE PUBLIC TRUST – a trust which was accorded to the Judiciary as a necessity.
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality is a law which mandates non-disclosure by lawyers within Pennsylvania. WHERE IT AFFECTS THE SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS OF LITIGANTS, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania was without the proper authority to enact the law, an unconstitutional nullity which would be enforced until declared unconstitutional.
AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS LAW UNTIL IT IS DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Then, it never was a law. An unconstitutional nullity which can provide NO DEFENSE to person accused of violating the rights which are secured and protected by the Constitution of the United States.
Governor Tom Wolf, alone, has the only lawful constitutional authority to begin resolution of this national crisis.
As a non-lawyer, the Governor may take action to remove this improperly enacted and unconstitutional law. Lawyers on the governors staff have been persistent in efforts which intercept interfere and prevent a meeting to address this serious issue with the Governor. (Staff lawyers actions are concealed pursuant to unconstitutional Rule 1.6.)
Pursuant to the Pennsylvania Constitution, the Governor can call the Legislature to assemble to address the issue.
Pursuant to the Pennsylvania Constitution, ONLY the Legislature has authority to suspend a law.
The leadership in the Legislature have prevented the issue from being presented, addressed and resolved. (Legislative Leadership are lawyers whose actions are concealed pursuant to unconstitutional Rule 1.6.)
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court was without proper constitutional authority when enacting a law which affects substantive rights of litigants. Rule 1.6 prevents lawful action by the Judiciary to address their own undoing. Rule 1.6 prevents the Pennsylvania Supreme Court from addressing the constitutionality of their own unconstitutional law whether by petition or sua sponte.
IN THE INTEREST OF RESTORING…
THE RIGHTS SECURED AND PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AND
THE RULE OF LAW ENACTED BY THE PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATURE,
I respectfully request that the Honorable Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ORDER the Governor’s Office of General Counsel to cease and desist in their efforts to prevent my meeting with Governor Tom Wolf.
And Where lawful, OGC encouragement and efforts to accomplish the scheduling of that meeting quickly would be beneficial to all Pennsylvanians, and ALL AMERICANS.
Where the Montgomery County District Attorney has undermined and neglected to provide the Court of Common Pleas with proper jurisdiction by failing to adhere to the Rule of Law, and by having neglected the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure and having failed to address the their denial of rights which are secured and protected by the Constitution of the United States…
Where those lawless, unconstitutional and corrupt actions have previously been permitted to be ignored and concealed pursuant to unconstitutional Rule 1.6 Confidentiality…
I respectfully request that this Honorable Supreme Court, as a court of first jurisdiction in any matter in the Commonwealth, immediately ORDER that all criminal charges against DEFENDANT, Terance Healy, be DISMISSED with prejudice.
I respectfully request that ALL THOSE INVOLVED in the false allegations and corrupt efforts (abuse of power under color of law, official oppression, prosecutorial misconduct, constitutional violations etc…) which intimidate and threaten the life and liberty of DEFENDANT, Terance Healy, be immediately arrested for their crime(s) and taken into custody to be prosecuted without any option for BAIL (as those involved have conspired to document, train and conceal the a clear threat to murder the Defendant.
I am one man who has survived the terror of having no protection of the law and the complete denial of constitutional rights.
I am under constant threat of further abuse and oppression. It is ALOT for one man to bear. I beg your help… SAFELY TO ARRIVE AT MY HOME.
I persevere,
Terance Healy
No Comment.
Add Your Comment