A Terroristic Divorce

Defendant requests the Honorable Court refer this matter to the proper law enforcement organization for investigation of the crimes committed by the District Attorney, the Office of the District Attorney, and the various County departments and personnel with whom there exists an attorney-client privilege which mandates non-disclosure Plaintiffs and their representative counsel.

Defendant calls judicial notice where there exists various Attorney-Client relationships involving the Montgomery County District Attorney, the Office of the District Attorney staff, various organizations within the Montgomery County Courthouse, and their legal representatives, including Court Administration, the Clerk of Courts whose actions concealed by mandates of Confidentiality pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information prevents information, investigation and prosecution while obstructing justice and denying constitutional rights.

Defendant calls judicial notice to the resultant denial of the Rule of Law and Constitutional protections which demonstrate Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information to be unconstitutional and improperly enacted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania pursuant to Article V Section 10 (c).

Defendant calls judicial notice where there may exist various Attorney-Client relationships involving the Office of the Attorney General of Pennsylvania by which the mandates of Confidentiality pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information prevents investigation and prosecution while obstructing justice and denying constitutional rights.

Defendant requests the Court refer the matter to the proper lawful authority unencumbered by ANY privileged relationships or ANY improperly enacted and unconstitutional Confidentiality mandates which deny and prevent justice and interfere with and deny the constitutional rights of the Defendant.

Defendant suggests a Special Investigator, unencumbered by any Attorney-Client relationships mandated pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information, be appointed to investigate and once completed refer the matter for prosecution by the proper law enforcement organization.

This is NOT unprecedented. Since December 1, 2015, Doug Gansler, as Special Attorney General, has been conducting an investigation on behalf of the Commonwealth where it is was deemed essential and necessary that his efforts be unencumbered by attorney-client relationships and Rule 1.6 mandates of confidentiality.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Defendant