12.06
Matt,
I would appreciate the opportunity to address what occurred this morning at the courthouse.
The Commissioners fund the Mental Health Department which failed to adhere to any aspect of the Mental Health Act and failed to properly train police or address the negligence of their MHMR Department.
The Commissioners fund the Public Defender. They have threatened and intimidated the ENTIRE PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE into withdrawing from the Appeal.
Bradley Bastedo is my public defender. He has indicated the pressure and intimidation of the county in the matter. Brad has indicated multiple times that my life is threatened. I had asked Brad to bring the case to your attention.
Brad has refused to provide any documents. He also has refused to provide me with my files. The case is on a Confidential Docket. I have no access to the records and/or any of the information he has obtained by subpoena.
Judge McMasters has recognized the criminal aspect and continued the Appeal in his courtroom. Clearly, the judge noticed the criminality of the efforts against me and the affect upon my rights and denial of my liberty. Judge McMasters is seeing the manipulation and abuse of using a fraudulent involuntary commitment to cause harm, threaten and harass… And to keep me in fear for my life.
The Commissioners are generous benefactors to the county legal aid organizations.
Legal Aid would be the organization to whom the commissioners suggested I turn after instructing THEIR Public Defender Office to withdraw. That withdrawal remains to be addressed by the court. The commissioners had just given Legal Aid $3600 moments before their recommendaton. Clearly, they demonstrate their responsibility and deliberate efforts, involvement and funding to prevent and obstruct the Appeal in the Common Pleas Court and to keep me in fear of recurrence.
The commissioners have refused to meet or discuss the matter AND have neglected to respond to emails.
The list of crimes grew quickly while the Commissioners failed to recognize their responsibilities and the extension of their direct involvement in denying the Rule of law and interfering with Constitutionally protected rights. There was nothing clandestine about their actions or intent or failure to resolve any issue.
Do the commissoners believe it is any less a crime when it occurs in a public meeting?
Interference with legal representation
Bribery
Misconduct
Honest Services Fraud
Extortion under color of official right
Aiding and abetting
Etc…..
Can we meet to discuss the matter soon? Would you prefer I file a private criminal complaint?
As you were a witness would you prefer to refer prosecution to Attorney General Shapiro?
Respectfully,
Terance Healy
No Comment.
Add Your Comment