2018
01.12

Rule 1.6 is additionally improperly enacted and unconstitutional where it has usurped the authority of the Legislature to define jurisdiction of the courts.

By a mandate of Confidentiality which conceals the affect on jurisdiction, the Supreme Court of PA violated ANOTHER CONDITION OF Article V Section 10(c) when mandating Confidentiality.

Effectively overthrowing the rule of law, the constitutionally protected rights of the litigant and the constitutional authority of the Legislature.

“… nor affect the right of the General Assembly to determine the jurisdiction of any court or Justice of the Peace…”

Rule 1.6 can be demonstrated to remove the jurisdiction from the Court of Common Pleas while placed there by law, but where confidentiality prevents the court from indicating their lack of jurisdiction is caused where a prior directly related order is defective and void.

A court with established jurisdiction is left without jurisdiction and any explanation while concealing prior court lacked jurisdiction.

Judge Weilheimer indicated a lack of jurisdiction TO CONCEAL the deliberately defective and void orders of Judge Carluccio.

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania violated the PA Constitution in enactingt Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.
– Affecting the substantive rights of lit8igants
– Affecting the right of the General Assembly to determine the jurisdiction of any court .

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality could not be permitted to leave a litigant without recourse.

In 2015, Terance Healy, in writing to the General Assembly to notify them of EXACTLY SUCH AN OCCURRENCE in Healy v Miller, invoked the wrath of the lawyers, District Attorney Office, ATTACKED THE MESSENGER and the courts have additionally participated for three years… and now seek to threaten my Liberty even further.

AGAIN, I seek the intervention of the General Assembly and the Governor to stop their retaliation.

A Conspiracy to conceal a defective and void order lacking juridiction in a proceeding where jurisdiction is lackling and prevented from exposure concealed by Confidentiality…. for three years and through every level of PA Courts the neglect to address the jurisdiction is evident and clearly Confidential… WHERE IT EFFECTIVELY OVERTHREW THE ENTIRE LEGISLATURE…
(and silent efforts of lawyers in the Legislature)
DESTROYED THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO BECAME INFORMED AND AWARE.

Rule 1.6 caused – No rule of law for me, no constitutional rights for me, and usurped the constitutional authority of the Legislature.

“… such rules are consistent with this Constitution and neither abridge, enlarge nor modify the substantive rights of any litigant…”

“nor affect the right of the General Assembly to determine the jurisdiction of any court”

The lawyers in the PA Legislature did not have the constitutional authority to neglect their involvement regarding JURISDICTION of the courts. But, neglect they did.

No Comment.

Add Your Comment

%d bloggers like this: