A Terroristic Divorce

A reliance on defective and void Orders lacking any jurisdiction and a Confidentiality law which mandates lawyers non-disclosure.

That statement is precise.

Defective – did not follow law.

Void – a nullity and unenforceable

Jurisdiction – a necessity of ANY court order.

Confidentiality Law – Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information (incorporated by cross-reference throughout the Rules of Professional Conduct.)
The collateral affects of confidentiality undermine the rule of law and all constitutional rights while the lawyers are MANDATED to non-disclosure.
– It is unconstitutional
— It is improperly enacted – Article V Section 10(c)

The Abusive Effect of Rule 1.6 is triggered by injustice, which is kept secret, Confidential, NON-DISCLOSED.

The abuse, absent any Rule of Law, ignorant of any constitutionally protected right, … In my case, everyone silently participated for years.

2007
The secret Order of (#1) Judge Rhonda Lee Daniele undermined the judiciary, the law, the constitutions…
(TRIGGERS RULE 1.6 ABUSE before Defendant ever sees any courtroom.)

(#2) The Hon. Judge Toby Dickman was never affected.
(Footnotes in Orders indicate attempt to provide protection.)

(#3) Judge Ott

(#4) Judge Tilson

(#5) Judge DelRicci – conceals the secret order when identified in his court.

(#6) Judge Bertin

…

The defective and void Divorce Decree of (#16) Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio – she stifled the appeal – just ignored and neglected

Attempted Enforcement (#17) Judge Haaz does nothing.

Attempted Enforcement (#19) Judge Page provides further abuse.

Attempted Appeal (#20) Judge Austin refuses to participate.

2013 – The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information. Explained every malicious act and bad actor as a participant in non-disclosure. Unconstitutional affect. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court had no authority to enact the law.
– Improperly enacted and unconstitutional Confidentiality of Information which denied the Rule of Law and prevented EVERY constitutional right.

Yet, they persist.

2013
Chased from the court of (#21) Judge Duffy by an out of control Administrator who interferes with hearing.

Yet, they persist further.

2015
(#21) Judge Duffy neglects procedure and law. clerks falsify computer records.

(#22) Judge Carpenter unable to address, explain or resolve the lack of jurisdiction.

Appeal #1

Appeal #2

Appeal #3

2017
Appeal #3 escalates to Supreme Court.

2018
Without jurisdiction, hearing is ‘ordered’. Appealed 1/9/2018.

When an attorney finds the unconstitutional affect and is affected by it directly, or the client is clearly affected, and where there is nothing they can accomplish to prevent or undo the unconstitutional actions, they have a responsibility as an officer of the court to act to address the unconstitutional law and to prevent its unconstitutional affects.

(This is why Dean Beers, Montgomery County Public Defender, has instructed his office to NOT READ ANYTHING in my case.)

(This is why Kathleen Kane, was secretly ordered by two-unidentified courts to PERSONALLY neglect the responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney general. This is why they took her law license.)

(The efforts to prevent exposure by AG Kane exposed in email exchanged by the Office of the Attorney General. The Doug Gansler Report.)

2015 – A preliminary hearing without waiver of counsel and without colloquoy where it is stated on the record that the litigant wishes to assert his constitutional right to representation, HOWEVER that counsel must be unencumbered by an improperly enacted and unconstitutional mandate of confidentiality which can be demonstrated to deny the rule of law and prevent constitutional rights.

2015 – False Entries into a Government Computer System

The result – the Court of Common Pleas is without jurisdiction and lawyers are mandated to non-disclosure.

Collateral Orders – for example: Bail Orders are defective and void where the law and constitutioanl rights have been ignored.

BUT, Confidentiality prevents everyone from any resolution. And anyone who becomes too informed learns the UNCONSTITUTIONAL affect. Anyone who becomes directly involved becomes INVOLVED in the unconstitutional acts… and obligated to raise the issue… (or feign stupidity)

HOWEVER, NOTHING CAN STOP THE FURTHER ABUSE AND TERROR TO THE DEFENDANT UNTIL THE RULE OF LAW AND THE CONSTITUTIONS ARE NO LONGER IGNORED BY A MANDATE OF CONFIDENTIALITY.