A Terroristic Divorce

Approaching the matter ftom the perspective that good people follow the law and are honest UNTIL THEY DO SOMETHING TO INDICATE THAT THEY ARE NOT.

SEEING SOMETHING IS BELIEVING.

DON’T FALL FOR THE DISTRACTIONS.

PEOPLE ONLY LIE WHEN THEY ARE CAUGHT OR ARE INSTRUCTED TO LIE.

WHEN A LAWYER WON’T PROVIDE THE PROOF, HIS STATEMENT IS A LIE.

1. Fearlessness – participants know they will not be prosecuted for doing their part.

The District Attorney has yet to respond to two criminal complaints filed in January 2017 regarding the theft of two properties through manipulative and fraudulent actions filed with the court.

Those complaints involved the County Prothonotary and the County Sheriff.

Fraudulent default orders were entered by the Prothonotary. The sheriff acted on the fraudulent orders. Both were aware of the fraud which they became involved. There has been no explanation from the DA for the delay. Those complaints involved the County Prothonotary and the County Sheriff.

In January 2018, the newly elected Prothonotary, Shetiff and Recorder of Derds took office. Meetings were held with each as a third property, a man’s home, had been aggressively pursued since January 2011.

2. No Accountability – participants each blame the fraudulent order, or fraudulent information, or indicate the people behind their instructions.

The Sheriff blames the default order.

-No original signature, default where filings were not accepted, Fraudulent and defective service, not served according to court order (where alternative service involved extra steps otherwise unnecessary.*)

The Prothonotary blames for the Defendamt for failing to respond. Failing to acknowledge her refusal to accept any filings fron the Defendant based on an order which she refused to provide. The purported order prevented any filings in any matter. Failing to indicate, or include, the order which authorized her to violate the rights of the defendant. She felt no need to cover her motivation for corrupt actions. Why? See #1.

The sheriff was asked to intervene. He did nothing. A person has a constitutional right to file with courts for the redress of grievances.

Any such order would be unconstitutional.

For the court to issue such an order would require a hearing but there had been none.

Court Administration refused to provide the purported order which indicated the Defendant could not file documents with the court.

The sheriff was asked to intervene. He did nothing.

Last year, court administration had sent a letter indicating the recusal of the entire judiciary had been at their request. They refused to provide their request. The refused to privide the order granting the request.

There is no logical reason for Court Administration to advise of this action where unwilling to explain or provide copies of paperwork. This was a distraction.

Logically, what seems to have happened is that the judiciary indicated an awareness that the litigation was fraudulent and they would have no further involvment in the matter. Their indication of the fraudulent litigation would expose anyone who was already directlty. Court Administration participated in concealing the fraud while permitting it to continue.

The entire judiciary had recused.

Court Administration participated in concealing the fraud while permitting it to continue.

The letter from court administration indicated the recusal was at their request.

Everything points towards court administration.

There is no logical reason to seek alternative service. There is no proof to their statememt of being unable to mail the documents. Other documents had been delivered without problem.

The order from the judge granting alternative service requires three steps be accomplished. The two which were not done, regular mail and certified mail, were a part of regular service. They were seekong to involve the sheriffs department as they would mislead indicating service had been accomplished while they neglected the other two steps.

The other two steps involved the US Postal Service. Regular mail can be falsified using a service from Pitney Bowes called Pre-Sort. The county does use the service, has a budget for its use, and items appear to have ben sent through the mail. But, there are obvious clues if you know some details.

Regular mail would have been acceptable normal service. This was included in the judges order deliberately.

Certified mail can only be accomplished through the US Postal service. This alone would have been acceptable normal service. This was included in the order deliberately.

The judge had ordered three methods of service. One involved the Sheriff posting to the property AND THE OTHER TWO WOULD INVOLVE THE USPS.

INVOLVING THE US POSTAL SERVICE IN ANY FRAUDULENT ACTION IS MAIL FRAUD. A FEDERAL CRIME.

SERVICE BY REGULAR MAIL DID NOT OCCUR.

SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL DID NOT OCCUR.

BUT WHY? For $5 in stamps and fees to neglect the conditions of the court order would put your effort at risk.

UNLESS you could get a fool to suspend the knowledge of all the fraudulent acts he heard about over the year and MISLEAD him the judge meant “OR”, and prevent the fool from asking the judge (upstairs in the same building) to clarify.

The filing of a notice of appeal would serve to stay the execution of the order until after the appeal is addressed.

The appeal could be filed directly in Superior Court and not be subjected to the purported ban on Defendant filing in Bucks County. The purported ban could be sidestepped.

Prior to having a FINAL ORDER, the Superior Court will ignore an appeal. It is also necessary to have the order you wish to appeal. And they failed to mail it. It was found when posted but the document lacked original signatures, seals, proper formatting and had incomplete blank pages.

The incomplete order and lack of service was indicated to the sheriffs department in a letter – CEASE AND DESIST. The letter could not be refused like the filings had been. It could be ignored. The sheriff did nothing.

And then on the decision day, dismissing all the information that indicated the impropriety of the taking the action which would cause irreparable damages. The deputies were instructed to transfer possessionof the home.

Immediately, Derendants property was being ransacked.

It took them nine (9) years to find someone to complete their fraud.

It was the person whom the defendant had informed of the history and was trusting to prevent further crimes against him. The person who did NOTHING for a year while watching the obstruction of justice and official oppression.

He sent men with guns to execute the fraud. Abuse of power under color of law.

When asked to explain his awful decision in spite of the facts, he threatened criminal charges for asking for an explanation.

Threatening further fraud and abuse of poer under color of law.

Indicating I was not to contact him or the sheriffs department. Official oppression.

uick

What a descent for the one who was expected to do the right thing.

Read the heading. Expectations were realistic. But he failed to follow law and procedure and made things worse.

They found the weakest link. Pray he never learns what happens next. Their helpers do not do so well.