A Terroristic Divorce

Yet again a lawyer has proven the power of the retailation exerted against anyone who might help me.
Court proceedings are demonstrated together a complete farce. A hoax. A game.

The trouble arises. There was no way for me not to prevail.

The solution: Conduct a farce and never let it end.

Convince me to trust people who recognize and understand the issue. Trust they will do their job. When you do… their lies start to grow and take control.

Here we are…
No court orders. No scheduling orders. The imaginary ones not abided.
No court decisions.
No documents which appear to be filed.
No petitions.
No briefs.
No responses.

All transcripts prevented unless ordered by the court.

On a CONFIDENTIAL Court Docket.
All evidentiary documents which were to have been obtained by dubpeona and investigators unavailable.
(Now, they have been informed if everything they need to conceal and destroy. Imagine that. … Telling them the evidence they need to hide. And stalling for years to make sure law could be changed to allow for disposal.)

No future where without rights every penny earned could be stolen. Anything obtained could be taken without recourse.

And my family… (without my knowledge) contacts my wife to check my story about her ability to prevent any future employment or earnings. She assures them that is exactly what she plans. She has the fraudulent documents which enable my destruction because no law, no precedent, no rights can stop the continuation of terror where the corruption of an entire county judiciary (over 22 judges) would need to be addressed.

My family leaves me the outcast… and continues to involve my wife in their lives.

Isolated. Alone. I persevere through the terror. I hope for an escape. While more become involved against me. I remain in fear of another police assault. The last one involved hundreds of people. And no one helps.

No one helps.
No one helps.
No one.

OVER VIEW

RULES enacted by the Judiciary avoid constitutional review causing damages capable of repetition while evading any review. The collateral unconstitutional affects can undermine the Rule of Law and the protected constitutional rights of all Americans affecting the integrity of state and federal courts.

RULES enacted by the Judiciary prevent the Mueller Report from being provided (unredacted) to the US Congress. Why?

The Judicial Branch may establish Rules for the administration of the courts. Their administrative responsibility includes lawyers within its purview. Lawyers (state and federal) are required to follow the professional rules for the jurisdiction in which they are working. The professional Rules are established by the Judiciary in each state.

The Judicial Branch has no authority to establish RULES for the administration of the Legislative Branch.
The Judicial Branch has no authority to establish RULES for the administration of the Executive Branch.

Yet, it would seem that Lawyers in the Legislative and Executive branches abide Rules established by the Judiciary even where it ignores truth, prevents facts from being presented, obstructs and interferes with investigations, and can interfere with the Legislative and Executive branches and their ability to review complete information without edits, redactions or ommissions.

Confidentiality of Information pursuant to Rule 1.6, incorporated throughout Model Rules by direct reference, cross reference and footnote, further serves to prevent recourse. The court is required to adhere to it’s own Rule for non-disclosure. The Result: An unsigned unsubstantiated and irrelevant Per Curiam order dismisses the matter without explanation and prevents any further appeal.

Americans find themselves without recourse and have no escape from retaliatory actions which seek to conceal the injustice which they are experiencing.

A line used over 400 times in The Mueller Report is avoiding any attention while pointing directly at this problem. At the top of each page, it indicates that redaction was done per RULES enacted by the judiciary.

When the judiciary enacts an unconstitutional rule, lawyers are prevented from exposing it (Rule 1.6). Damages obstruct justice, deny the Rule of Law and ignores constitutionally protected rights.

The Constitutional Conundrum of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information improperly enacted and unconstitutional in each state and federally with damage capable of repetition while evading any review.

Rule 1.6 also holds confidential any indication of fraudulent efforts required to prevent disclosure. Ignoring it’s own fraud provisions was unanticipated. The provisions were removed, restored – and remain ignored.

Lawyers are permitted to mislead and misinform in the interest of non-disclosure. Applicable to public statements AND statements within the court, BUT, perhaps not so much in the US Congress. Lawyers are often findng themselves caught in lies which the Congress does not excuse.

One phrase used over 400 times in The Mueller Report is avoiding any attention.

At the top of each page, it indicates that redaction was done per RULES enacted by the judiciary.

There is no constitutional review of those rules. When the judiciary enacts an unconstitutional law, all lawyers are prevented from exposing it, Rule 1.6. Even where it obstructs justice, denies the Rule of Law and ignores constitutionally protected rights.

The Constitutional Conundrum of Rule1.6 Confidentiality improperly enacted and unconstitutional in each state and federally with damage capable of repetition while evading any review.

Rule1.6 also holds confidential any indication of fraudulent efforts of lawyers required for non-disclosure.

Lawyers are permitted to mislead and misinform in the interest of confidentiality. This judicial rule is applied to public statements AND statements made in court, BUT, maybe notsomuch to the US Congress.

                                April 17, 2019

Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House
Jerrold Nadler, Chairman, House Committe on the Judiciary
Adam Shiff, Chairman, House Permanent Committee on Intelligence
Charles E, Schumer, Senate Demotratic Leader
Dianne Feinstein, Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Mark Warner, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

Congress of the United States
Washington, DC 20515

You have been aware of the Constitutional Conundrum of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality for several years. Having that information, you have written or put your name to a farce to distract Americans while you continue ignoring the problem.

Where it would be entirely lawful for you to maintain a respectful silence, you have instead taken an action which seeks to permit the problem to persist. This is a direct contradiction of your oath. While Rule 1.6 excuses the disregard for the Rule of Law and Constitution, you demonstrate where it conceals the disregard for your oath of office.

You may have been advised by your legal counsel, or are yourself a lawyer, obligated by non-disclosure. You seek to shift responsibility for the failure to disclose the information to another lawyer while aware Attorney General William Barr is similarly obligated.

You are aware of the legal compulsion (Rule 1.6) which requires the AG to redact the report. The misdirection by your suggestion that any non-disclosure is based on political party is a disingenuous fraud. Your accusation seeks to divide and confuse all Americans.

Your effort seeks to prevent the cause of EVERY AMERICAN INJUSTICE IGNORED from being exposed. Worse still, continued disinformation and fraud will permit, perpetuate, ignore and conceal the injustice.

If there were a possibility of review, Rule 1.6 would mandate non-disclosure. Demonstrating it’s self-defense. The unconstitutional Confidentiality Rule mandates non-disclosure that it is unconstitutional.

There is no review for unconstitutional Rules enacted by the Judiciary. Other rules serve to deflect or obstruct any recourse. Rule 1.6 is often amended by each state judiciary to assure continued non-disclosure perhaps intending to protect the integrity of the judiciary. Those amendments have left a trail of crumbs which indicate the intent and forethought seeking to perpetuate the injustice and conceal the scandal without regard for the continuing injustice . The Kids for Cash case involving thousands of children abused by judges demonstrates an extreme silence by the lawyers and the extreme neglect by the PA Supreme Court in failing to review. Silence in spite of extreme injustices per Rule 1.6.

I am an American without any protection of the Rule of Law. I have been denied every right reportedly protected by the US Constitution. The Pennsylvania courts failed to address these issues (laws and rights) non-disclosure or review denied by unsigned unsubstantiated per curiam orders. I have faced severe retaliation for seeing this problem and recognizing it as the source of EVERY inexplicable American Injustice since 1983.

When demonstrated ‘unconstitutional’, the Rule was re-caste into ‘secret orders from an unidentified court’ which required the Pennsylvania Attorney General to PERSONALLY neglect the responsibilities of her office. Unappealable without a loss or cause for releif, the Attorney General then neglected my effort to address the unconstitutional law, The target, myself, who had loss and cause for releif was prevented from the distribution of the documents. After requesting copies of documents which appeared on the court docket, the documents were not provided and the entries disappeared.

The Pennsylvania Legislature and Governor failed to inquire about the ‘secret orderS’. The existence of the orders was not Confidential. The court remains unidentified. The purpose for unexplained.

The resposibilities of the Office of the Attorney General are established by Law enacted by the Legislature and signed by the Governor. Neither the Governor nor any Legislator inquired about the nature and content of the orders which undermined their Law and usurped their constitutional authority.

Rule 1.6 also causes a malicious prosecution to proceed where a District Attorney is prevented from exposing his staff. The malicious prosecution will prevail absent the Rule of Law and ignoring all constitutional rights. Further, the Defendant will be prevented from presenting any defense. Each effort to apply Law or rights will be ignored and held confidential. Rule 1.6 conceals the wrongdoing and causes false and malicious prosecutions to be succesful. There can be no opportunity for appeal which exposes the failure by the court to apply the Rule of Law or where it has ignored protected rights. Myself, former PA Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane, William Cosby and Todd Krautheim, and millions of others, have experienced this retaliation.

As such, I take great concern regarding your letter.

If Barr & Rosenstein redact Mueller’s report for Congress, it will be by choice, not legal compulsion. 

Rosenstein chose to give a GOP House nearly 1 million pages of discovery in Clinton & Russia probe. 

But they choose not to give 400 pages of Trump-related info to a Dem House.

The “legal compulsion” is Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION, an unconstitutional law improperly enacted in each state and federally. Injustice capable of repetition while evading review.

There is no review for constitutionality of Rules enacted by the Judiciary.

Rule 1.6, in and of itself, mandates non-disclosure where it would be exposed as the cause of EVERY AMERICAN INJUSTICE IGNORED.

Your letter is a fraud. You each ignore your oath of office. Your actions indicate you prefer to be a part of perpetuating the problem instead of permitting it’s resolution.

Your false rhetoric is deceptive to the general public and to non-lawyer members of the Congress whom you encourage to participate and endorse your fraud.

There remains a lawful way to remove this unconstitutional Rule while abiding it until it is determined to be unconstituitional. After 56 state Attorneys General had defaulted in a Constitutional Challenge, Fraudulent efforts of lawyers obstructed the matter and prevented appellate review.

I will persevere towards the lawful removal of Rule 1.6, and the exposure of the damage caused by Rule 1.6. When there has been fraudulent interference the effort has been obstructed.

Rule 1.6 can only be challenged by a non-lawyer. In 2013 , the US Supreme Court issued a Rule which removes them from involvment in any review or resolution as they required all parties before them to be represented by a lawyer. Preventing any non-lawyer from recourse, and preventing any non-lawyer from challenging their new Rule. Their intention is evident. Their action is likely unconstitutional, but only a lawyer obligated by non-disclosure … exactly. The involvement of the US Supreme Court is not a necessity, though it would have been a more responsible and fitting place for the issue to be raised.

For over 5 years, meeting requests have been ignored by state senators and representatives, and Senators and Representatives in the US Congress. The legal staff (Office of General Counsel) of Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf, a non-lawyer, has prevented any meeting. Previously, Governor Tom Corbettt, a lawyer, was prevented from any effort to expose or resolve the issue.

I welcome any opportunity to discuss this issue with yourself or any member or committee of Congress.

Sincerely.

Terance Healy

www.work2bdone.com/live

Justice is coming.

Cc: President Donald Trump
US Attorney General William Barr
PA Governor Tom Wolf
PA Attorney General Josh Shapiro
US Senate Judiciary Committee
US House Judiciary Committee
US Supreme Court

Washington DC in chaos as it attempts to conceal the needle in the haystack of injustice. Unconstitutional and improperly enacted in each state and federally AND capable of repetition while evading review.

There is no review for constitutionality for Rules enacted improperly by the Judiciary.

Every paragraph of the Model Rules (spread across the US from 1983-2007) refers to ONE Rule which undoes the Rules, the Rule of Law, Due Process and every Constitutional right… That ONE Rule also prevents itself from being identified as the cause.

The Constitutional Conundrum of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information

– A deliberate and intentional act of sedition by the American Bar Association. Removing the fraud provisions from Rule 1.6 and concealing the manipulations which prevented exposure and resolution. Bread crumbs in every state can be found as the Rule was edited to remain concealed.

Justice is coming.

Barack Obama did nothing because the Rule prevented him. Hillary Clinton would have been similarly blocked. The US Attorneys General who in recent years have failed to prosecute scandalous crimes were obstructed by Rule 1.6 – a very broad application of confidentiality which includes attorney-client privilege.

The first non-lawyer President since Ronald Reagan, President Donald Trump, is in office doing constant battle with lawyers. After each state had defaulted, President Trump’s sister, Maryann Trump Barry, was on the 3rd Circuit court which was prevented from the review of the concealed Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6.

When unconstitutionality was established and proven, secret orders from unidentified courts recaste the unconstitutional rule into an improper and unappealable order requiring the PA Attorney General to personally neglect the matter. Retaliation for an effort to expose the problem brought an aggressive downfall. Rule 1.6 prevents the disclosure of false prosecution by mandating non-disclosure even where it prevents the presentation of any defense.

Where the truth is prevented by the Confidentiality Rule, misdirection and lies are demonstrating the damage caused to law enforcement by this secret silent destroyer of integrity. The AG in place under George Bush, William Barr, IS BACK IN PLACE fully aware of what happened and now he is before The US Congress.

I Persevere. Justice is coming.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AS A SELF-REPRESENTED PARTY

I am the Appellant in the above-captioned case. As the matter proceeds, I intend to represent myself. Previously, Bradley Bastedo, from the Public Defender’s Office, has represented me in this case.

It has been demonstrated that his representation has been affected by the interference of the Public Defender and the County Commissioners. Multiple Motion(s) to Withdraw exposed the interference and was addressed by the court in DENIAL of those motions.

County interference has persisted in affecting representation in this matter. After a brief meeting last week, it became evident that his less than zealous approach to the matter was no longer in the best interest of his client.

While I would prefer to have the representation of legal counsel, I am hindered financially and recognize the broad influence of the County Commissioners responsible for significant financial business opportunities which engage lawyers and law firms throughout the county.

Additionally, non-disclosure pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information would prevent attorneys involved in this effort from zealous representation as it could expose unintentional misrepresentation in prior cases, for prior clients, for prior law firms, for themselves, for their firms, or for their offices.

Any effort to prevent disclosure would be in direct opposition to presenting this case before the court.

Various situations which could affect continuing representation had been discussed with Mr. Bastedo. Such a situation now exists. Self-representation, while not preferred, has become the necessity.

I shall provide and serve this document to opposing counsel upon filing with the court.

I shall provide and serve Mr. Bastedo, and the Public Defender, with this document and request the immediate delivery of any case related documents, files, transcripts, notes and collateral to my attention. A listing of items not provided and reasons should also be provided.

All future pleadings and other legal notices should be sent to my attention.

                        Respectfully,

Approaching the matter ftom the perspective that good people follow the law and are honest UNTIL THEY DO SOMETHING TO INDICATE THAT THEY ARE NOT.

SEEING SOMETHING IS BELIEVING.

DON’T FALL FOR THE DISTRACTIONS.

PEOPLE ONLY LIE WHEN THEY ARE CAUGHT OR ARE INSTRUCTED TO LIE.

WHEN A LAWYER WON’T PROVIDE THE PROOF, HIS STATEMENT IS A LIE.

1. Fearlessness – participants know they will not be prosecuted for doing their part.

The District Attorney has yet to respond to two criminal complaints filed in January 2017 regarding the theft of two properties through manipulative and fraudulent actions filed with the court.

Those complaints involved the County Prothonotary and the County Sheriff.

Fraudulent default orders were entered by the Prothonotary. The sheriff acted on the fraudulent orders. Both were aware of the fraud which they became involved. There has been no explanation from the DA for the delay. Those complaints involved the County Prothonotary and the County Sheriff.

In January 2018, the newly elected Prothonotary, Shetiff and Recorder of Derds took office. Meetings were held with each as a third property, a man’s home, had been aggressively pursued since January 2011.

2. No Accountability – participants each blame the fraudulent order, or fraudulent information, or indicate the people behind their instructions.

The Sheriff blames the default order.

-No original signature, default where filings were not accepted, Fraudulent and defective service, not served according to court order (where alternative service involved extra steps otherwise unnecessary.*)

The Prothonotary blames for the Defendamt for failing to respond. Failing to acknowledge her refusal to accept any filings fron the Defendant based on an order which she refused to provide. The purported order prevented any filings in any matter. Failing to indicate, or include, the order which authorized her to violate the rights of the defendant. She felt no need to cover her motivation for corrupt actions. Why? See #1.

The sheriff was asked to intervene. He did nothing. A person has a constitutional right to file with courts for the redress of grievances.

Any such order would be unconstitutional.

For the court to issue such an order would require a hearing but there had been none.

Court Administration refused to provide the purported order which indicated the Defendant could not file documents with the court.

The sheriff was asked to intervene. He did nothing.

Last year, court administration had sent a letter indicating the recusal of the entire judiciary had been at their request. They refused to provide their request. The refused to privide the order granting the request.

There is no logical reason for Court Administration to advise of this action where unwilling to explain or provide copies of paperwork. This was a distraction.

Logically, what seems to have happened is that the judiciary indicated an awareness that the litigation was fraudulent and they would have no further involvment in the matter. Their indication of the fraudulent litigation would expose anyone who was already directlty. Court Administration participated in concealing the fraud while permitting it to continue.

The entire judiciary had recused.

Court Administration participated in concealing the fraud while permitting it to continue.

The letter from court administration indicated the recusal was at their request.

Everything points towards court administration.

There is no logical reason to seek alternative service. There is no proof to their statememt of being unable to mail the documents. Other documents had been delivered without problem.

The order from the judge granting alternative service requires three steps be accomplished. The two which were not done, regular mail and certified mail, were a part of regular service. They were seekong to involve the sheriffs department as they would mislead indicating service had been accomplished while they neglected the other two steps.

The other two steps involved the US Postal Service. Regular mail can be falsified using a service from Pitney Bowes called Pre-Sort. The county does use the service, has a budget for its use, and items appear to have ben sent through the mail. But, there are obvious clues if you know some details.

Regular mail would have been acceptable normal service. This was included in the judges order deliberately.

Certified mail can only be accomplished through the US Postal service. This alone would have been acceptable normal service. This was included in the order deliberately.

The judge had ordered three methods of service. One involved the Sheriff posting to the property AND THE OTHER TWO WOULD INVOLVE THE USPS.

INVOLVING THE US POSTAL SERVICE IN ANY FRAUDULENT ACTION IS MAIL FRAUD. A FEDERAL CRIME.

SERVICE BY REGULAR MAIL DID NOT OCCUR.

SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL DID NOT OCCUR.

BUT WHY? For $5 in stamps and fees to neglect the conditions of the court order would put your effort at risk.

UNLESS you could get a fool to suspend the knowledge of all the fraudulent acts he heard about over the year and MISLEAD him the judge meant “OR”, and prevent the fool from asking the judge (upstairs in the same building) to clarify.

The filing of a notice of appeal would serve to stay the execution of the order until after the appeal is addressed.

The appeal could be filed directly in Superior Court and not be subjected to the purported ban on Defendant filing in Bucks County. The purported ban could be sidestepped.

Prior to having a FINAL ORDER, the Superior Court will ignore an appeal. It is also necessary to have the order you wish to appeal. And they failed to mail it. It was found when posted but the document lacked original signatures, seals, proper formatting and had incomplete blank pages.

The incomplete order and lack of service was indicated to the sheriffs department in a letter – CEASE AND DESIST. The letter could not be refused like the filings had been. It could be ignored. The sheriff did nothing.

And then on the decision day, dismissing all the information that indicated the impropriety of the taking the action which would cause irreparable damages. The deputies were instructed to transfer possessionof the home.

Immediately, Derendants property was being ransacked.

It took them nine (9) years to find someone to complete their fraud.

It was the person whom the defendant had informed of the history and was trusting to prevent further crimes against him. The person who did NOTHING for a year while watching the obstruction of justice and official oppression.

He sent men with guns to execute the fraud. Abuse of power under color of law.

When asked to explain his awful decision in spite of the facts, he threatened criminal charges for asking for an explanation.

Threatening further fraud and abuse of poer under color of law.

Indicating I was not to contact him or the sheriffs department. Official oppression.

uick

What a descent for the one who was expected to do the right thing.

Read the heading. Expectations were realistic. But he failed to follow law and procedure and made things worse.

They found the weakest link. Pray he never learns what happens next. Their helpers do not do so well.

“If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you.”

Survivor of Extreme Chaos.
Master of Perseverance.
Resilience is my superpower.

There is no single and more destructive force than an unchecked judiciary acting without jurisdiction. Retaliation against survivors consumes every aspect of life. An improperly enacted and unconstitutional CONFIDENTIALITY requires the participation and complicity of the entire system – ALL lawyers are mandated by the aggressively enforced CONFIDENTIALITY. ALL lawyers are forced to participate in this rape of the Public Trust.

Only a non-lawyer can expose it… But, they must survive their destruction. They must keep their head when all about them are losing theirs and blaming it on them. I AM THAT SURVIVOR.

Only a non-lawyer American President can deal with the problem federally. The first non-lawyer president since Reagan is aware and experiencing the destructive force of terrified lawyers nationwide.

Today, December 17, 2018, Todd Krautheim’s home was stolen.

Since the initial fraudulent foreclosure was filed in January 2011, there have been hundreds of court filings. One of the earlier identified the fraud, the judge held a hearing and struck the action completely.

Yet, the lawyers persisted in filling constant petitions and fraudulent documents and accusations. Each was met with an appropriate response. A hearing was NEVER held again.

It became a manipulation game to attempt to obtain a default judgement. This went on for years. Constant filings, constant threats, constant risk, … In this interim two other properties were fraudulently stolen with the assistance of the county Sheriff and Prothonotary.

A local judge was indicted for a variety of federal crimes. His wife was employed by the county Prothonotary. She was the sole person responsible for default judgements. Her husband, the judge, had bragged that he could get a default on any property.

Those false default judgements would then be enforced by the county sheriff. With the sheriff indicating he was following the court order. Never caring if it was valid or fraud. Never checking.

In January 2018, Todd and I met with the newly elected sheriff. We explained the personal experience and requested his help to rid the county of this type of crime which destroys people and families. Todd met regularly and contacted the Chief Deputy with updates.

A new action challenged the home based on the fraud of the prior litigation. Not served the documents, when Todd learned of the matter he went to file a response and he was informed that there was an order which prevented him from any filing in the county. No copy was provided. No copy existed. A ghost order created by Court Administration. Court admin lawyers refused to provide the order. It didn’t exist. It would violations!ate the US Constitution.

The sheriff was notified of the obstruction, of the denial of access to the courts, and of the unavilable order which prevented responses, motions and pleadings. Asked to intervene to have the court accept documents, the Chief did nothing…. did nothing for months.

Then the Prothonotary issued a default order. No hearing. Never before any judge. The Chief was kept informed.

Then they sought alternative service of the final order for possession. Misrepresenting an inability to serve the owner of the home resulted in an alternative service being ordered by a judge. Three conditions had to be met. One to be procured through the sheriff department. Two others to be handled by the US Postal service. Plaintiff failed to serve the documents through the mail. The reason… They were avoiding mail fraud – a federal crime.

Two methods. Regular mail – could be avoided and concealed by using a service like Pitney Bowes Pre-Sort. It would look like mail. Certified Mail allowed no substitutes. Certified would require the fraudulent documents to be handled by the US Postal Service and involve the USPS in the crime. Federal Mail Fraud would escalate the crime for federal prosecution. It would identify the perpetrator even where hidden by a company created to conceal identities.

A deputy posted that eviction would take place. But, the failure to perform the alternative service would be a consequence.

Todd had been denied any protection of the law AND had been denied his constitutional rights, the Plaintiff had demonstrated that they were above the law. The Chief had been informed all along. He was aware of the fraud and the obstruction and the disregard for the law, rules or procedures.

Yet, today, while the time for filing an appeal remained, a copy of the Notice of Appeal was provided to the Chief. The Notice of Appeal would suffice to prevent irreparable damages and was appropriate to stop the execution of the order. It would stay the execution should the sheriff’s department ignore the Plaintiffs failure to follow the Court Order regarding service.

Foolishly believing that since the Sheriffs Department did their service that there was no need for the other conditions to be met. Arbitrary stupidity which could have been checked with the judge. But the chief who witnessed the crime and the details for a year made the decision with no regard for las, orders, truth, or the history. He knew the crime was occurring.

The dawn rose with two opportunities to legally and lawfully prevent the irreparable damage of eviction and destruction of property and possessions.
The sheriff had additionally been provided a Cease and Desist letter detailing the fraud which had lead to this date.

The chief ignored it all sending his deputies to remove Todd from his home. The deputies ignored the paperwork provided them. They were following the instructions of the Chief. The Chief made a very wrong decision all by himself. He presumed authority where he had none. While lacking jurisdiction for a variety of reasons including the three mentioned, the Chief asserted he was following a court order. Same one the plaintiff failed to follow causing it to be defective and void.

The chiefs direction to his deputies was an abuse of power. Where not supported by law, and with an void and defective court order, the Chief asserted he was following the law.. following the court order. But he couldn’t cite the law. He couldn’t explain why HE WAS THE LONE PERSON FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS IN THE COURT ORDER.

The only one following the law was Todd Krautheim.

He had endured nine (9) years of constant attempts to steal his home. His persistence and perseverence was met with retailiation and disdain. Everyone in the courthouse knew thenabuses being brought down on him. He never broke.

The entire judiciary had recused, yet court admin did not allow paperwork or reasoning to be exposed. The prothonotary had to be informed and involved. The prothy’s defaul order was KEY. The judges did not want to be involved in the crime. The motion for alternative service, an incidental procedural request, gave the illusion of involvement. But Judge Mellon had ordered conditions to be met. He knew the plaintiff would not comply. He didnt count on the weakest link.

When the person abusing his power under color of law sends a team of armed deputies to execute an order known to be defective and under an appeal, the wise man does as instructed by the bullies with the guns.

When the person abusing his power under coolor of law participates in the crimes reported to him, ignores the participation of county officers, fails to do anything to address the injustice over the course of a year,… When he acts with knowledge of the case becoming the self appointed decider YET MAKES THE ABSOLUTELY WORST DECISION completely unaware that the Plaintiffs fraud has now involved him. His lawless action in violation of several laws and Constitutions shifts the blame for the damage he is going to cause.

He went from investigator and Chief, to the single target for prosecution of the crimes he endorsed and ignored and ENABLED.

WITH INDIGNATION HE ASSERTED HIS INTEGRITY upon receipt of the Ceaseless and Desist letter. Unaware that his integrity was lacking while he did nothing for a year except watch. He had the foolishness to suggest his integrity unaffected after he demonstrated he had none.

At least the previous corrupt sheriff, Duke Donnelly, never imagined he ever had any integrity.

When unable to cite a law or substantiate his position, he threatens “This is notification that you are no longer permitted to contact me or this Office. Continued contact will result in criminal charges against you.”

I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation. Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedure and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… they each make the situation worse

I wrote that in 2008, it is how I introduce myself to those in a position to help. Every time they knowing and foolishly find themselves ensnared, they get embarassed. They threaten to swear out criminal charges against me.

When you have no protection of the law and all constitutional rights are being ignored, that threat cuts deep and is EXTREMELY aggresive.

WHEN CARELESSLY MADE BY SOMEONE WHO HAS ABUSED HIS AUTHORITY UNDER COLOR OF LAW, IT IS CALLED ‘OFFICIAL OPPRESSION.’

I was just contacted again. An attempt to taunt a response. Not falling for that. Not making continued contact.

The next phase is for the Chief to lawyer up. The lawyer will tell him:

To say nothing to no one.

To provide no response to any question from anyone.

To ignore everything and everyone associated.

In case of persistence threaten to call police and report the harassment.

Instruct all personnel to NOT communicate with the victim under any conditions. Threaten termination of any employers who give the appearance of communication. No email exchanges on the topic.

Personnel also are aware of the abuse of intrusive surveillance by the county and the police occurring in these cases. Phone, mail, email and internet will never be used to communicate or to respond.

It is likely that the Sheriff will also lawyer up. He will be told he has to protect the intgrity of his office, his staff and himself.

This is not the first corrupt action in the county. Those who conceal corruption present a considerable volume of invalid reasons to achieve your participation. They purport to protect the county, or the officer. Wouldnt the county be better protected by following the law? Wouldnt the county be better protected if it did not conceal their bad actions, or errors, or participation which destroyed a man after harassing him for 9 years?

Do you feel safer when you learn you are to particpate in the cover up and to prevent resolution or justice. Do you feel safe if your job is threatened?

The victim of the crime you are concealing probably wont feel safe or secure again.

They have learned that they have no protection under the law. In America, that idea of the LAW is so entrenched in the mindset that no one will believe the problem. They blame the victim. Even if they witness the crimes and injustices brought down on you they won’t let it in their head. They disappear.

County retaliation is relentless. Anyone who helps you will be targeted. They won’t believe you. When they realize, they disappear. Isolation is the objective.

Integrity is not protected by avoiding addressing responsibility for your error.

Integrity involves truth. Avoiding telling the truth does not protect your integrity. If your integrity has to hide or avoid the truth, it’s not integrity. It’s shame.

The cycle repeats. Even when you know it and take every precaution. Even when you prevail and seem to make progress. You are at the mercy of the person being threatened, making a mistake or finding themselves falsely prosecuted for perjury after exposing two of the largest scandals in american history. She was prosecuted before the second was exposed. And the prosecution against her relied on the improperly enacted and unconstitutional confidentiaity which would have been exposed.

tnly takes one corrupt actioneak link to undo all progress. advise people of the risk wrn oeolle tombtle careful