A Terroristic Divorce

The Special Committee on Senate Address is tightly focused on whether the ‘suspension’ of AG Kathleen Kane significantly impairs her ability to carry out her personal duties or the function of the Attorney General’s office.

The Committee includes six senators with half of them being Lawyers on the Judiciary Committee and the President Pro Tempore who is a member of all commmittees.

Chairman John Gordner, R-Columbia County LAWYER, Judiciary Committee @SenatorGordner
Senator Lisa Baker, R-Luzerne County @SenLisaBaker
Senator Art Haywood, D-Montgomery County LAWYER, Judiciary Committee @SenatorHaywood
Senator Judy Schwank, D-Berks County @SenJudySchwenk
Senator Sean Wiley, D-Erie County @SenatorWiley
Senator Gene Yaw, R-Lycoming County LAWYER, Judiciary Committee @SenatorGeneYaw
Senator Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson County @SenatorScarnati

Committee Website: Special Committee on Senate Address Website
EMAIL: senateaddress@pasen.gov

The email link is designed to provide an opportunity “for folks to provide information on a confidential basis that they think would be helpful and appropriate to the committee.”

The committee will schedule a public hearing in November to hear directly from legal professionals about what an attorney with a suspended law license “can do and can not do.”

QUESTIONS:

1) What about those ‘secret orders from unidentified courts’ which specifically ordered Kathleen Kane, the person, to personally neglect the responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney general?

2) Has the Legislature been provided the ‘secret orders from unidentified courts’ which prevent the Attorney General from the responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General as defined in the Commonwealth Attorneys Act?

3) If the Supreme Court has suspended the law license of the Attorney General, WHY DID THEY NEGLECT TO SIGN THE ORDER? Who affirmed? Who dissented? Who abstained?

4) If the suspension order is valid, why have the Supreme Court Justices indicated that their order should not be construed to remove Kathleen Kane from office.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania # 3151-2015

v.

Terance Healy

Notice is hereby given that Terance Healy, Defendant, Appellant above named, has received a copy of the attached 2 page letter which purports to be from the Honorable Judge William R. Carpenter Jr.

The letter relates to an Appeal filed on October 20, 2015.

The letter contradicts the verbal statement and acknowledgement of Judge Carpenter in open court on October 14, 2015 relating to the Appeal to the Superior Court..

On October 14, 2015, Judge Carpenter had granted permission for the interlocutory appeal to proceed.

Judge Carpenter had neglected to address the elements of jurisdiction as agreed on September 16, 2015.

The letter is improper and, while not ex parte, DOES NOT CONFORM to the Rules of Appellate Procedure as it attempts to prevent any review by the judges of the Superior Court.

The letter is not proper, lawful, or constitutional, as it seeks to deny and prevent access to the courts for redress of grievances.

The letter, if authentic, indicates that the judge has a conflict of interest in this matter which prevents the Court from addressing the defects in procedure which result in a lack of jurisdiction for the Court in this matter.

_________________________________
Terance Healy

THE TIRESOME GAMES INVOLVED IN PAPER TERRORISM…

For the Appeal filed on October 20, 2015, Judge Carpenter has granted an Order for filing fees ONLY.

This prevents the production of the court transcripts which are necessary for the issues relating to the appeal.

THIS CREATES A LITTLE CONFUSION.
Had the Court not approved the IFP, THE APPEAL WOULD AUTOMATICALLY MOVE FORWARD TO THE SUPERIOR COURT.
The Superior Court would have been required to review/approve the IFP.

By limiting the Order to provide only the filing fees, the Court has prevented the timely production of the Transcripts.

Issued without any proceeding, this same tactic prevented the production of the Transcripts in the Appeal in Healy v Healy. Each Court Reporter was directly personally contacted and instructed by the Court to NOT COMPLY with an Order already issued and to write letters which indicated their non-compliance.

The Court then struck it’s own order WITHOUT ANY PROCEEDING OR EXPLANATION OR RECOURSE. The Court ignored petitions requesting a hearing on the matter to provide reasons or explanations.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania # 3151-2015

v.

Terance Healy

Notice is hereby given that Terance Healy, Defendant, Appellant above named, hereby appeals to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania from the order entered in this matter on the 22nd day of October 2015.

There was no proceeding.
The attached Order is not signed by Judge William R. Carpenter.
The attached Order has been rubber stamped with the judge’s signature.
The attached Order prevents the production of transcripts of proceedings which are necessary for review regarding the related appeal.

The Court is acting without proper jurisdiction in this matter and has declined to address the issues of failure and neglect by the Attorney for the Commonwealth.

The Office of the District Attorney and the attorney representing the Commonwealth have failed to adhere to the Law, The Rules of Criminal Procedure, while ignoring rights protected and secured by the Pennsylvania Constitution and the Constitution of the United States.

As required by established procedure, Terance Healy, Defendant, Appellant above named, hereby appeals to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

This procedural action should not be interpreted or misconstrued so as to provide jurisdiction to the Court of Common Pleas.

Pursuant to Pa R.A.P. 904( c ), I, Terance Healy, notifies that as no proceeding was conducted, there is no transcript available.

The subject Order dated 22nd day of October 2015 order has been entered in the docket as evidenced by the attached copy of the docket entry.

______________________________
Terance Healy